Hello all- I really don't want to descend into the ethics of BTL in this thread- I was simply looking for some advice please (bear with me).
I recently walked away from a purchase that simply wasn't going to happen (too financially stretching), and decided to delve into the world of BTL instead. Everything moved pretty quickly, which is great. But I have some important decisions to make.
I am on the cusp of exchanging on a property:
- London
- 4 bed mid-terrace with garden
- town house
- ground floor: integral garage, double bedroom, downstairs toilet, ‘utility area’ (very basic)
- 1st floor: kitchen & living room (not quite open plan- but the kitchen is doorless)
- 2nd floor: bathroom, 2 bedrooms (a large double, and a medium-sized double) and 1 box room (perhaps the size of a study).
Now, at the point of completion (assuming nothing goes wrong…I hope!), I will have a little over 20K in savings, which could potentially go towards refurb.
I have a few options, the 2 main ones I’m thinking through are:
- Low level refurb: about 6K (on the cheap)
- do the bare minimum to justify the going rent for a decently spruced-up house of this sort in this area
- new bathroom on 2nd floor
- new toilet on ground floor
- possibly new kitchen
- a few other bits and bobs: new fences, extensive paint job etc
- can be let as soon as 4 weeks post-completion (if I’m organised :-s)
- More extensive work: will use the entire 20K (and no more if I’m very lucky…but this is unlikely)
- wall knocking (ground floor) and stud wall erecting (1st floor)
- re-configure: move living room and kitchen to ground floor (dividing wall in between, so not open plan)
- extension at back to make large kitchen-diner
- 2 good size doubles and bathroom on 1st floor
- 2nd floor configuration: unchanged
- build porch- creating space for downstairs loo (and try to squeeze washing machine +/- tumble dryer in here)
- work will likely take 8-12 weeks (if I'm organised!!), so this delays letting (which will be at 300-400 pounds more per month than Option 1)
I've never done this before. And I suppose the answer may seem obvious- spend as little money as possible for a liveable house and basic refurb; but the reason I’m seriously considering Option 2 is:
- higher cash flow can't be a bad thing...as long as the end justifies the means, obviously
- to be able to add value (extending; bringing living space on the same level as the garden)...I'm genuinely interested in a property 'project'.
- increased potential capital gain
An identical house a few doors down completed for 100K more than the purchase price of this one last month- however it has been extended in a similar way I would like to. I feel I can achieve this on a budget, and still be left with a house which in the future (15-20 years) which will pay its way.
I also read somewhere that for renovation to make financial sense, the property should be worth at least: it's purchase price + costs to renovate + 20%.
Does it make sense to put in the hard graft now (and use the majority of not all of the 20K); and know I won’t have to do anything major to the house (re: renovation) over the next 10-15 years?
I'd also rather not put in a new kitchen and bathrooms (however cheap they may be) and have resort to ripping them out in under 5 years time; to carry out Option 2 anyway- that would be a waste.
What would you do?
p.s. Again, sorry if this message comes across like I'm out to take advantage of renters. I'm not. I'm simply interested in property (as I have been for many years), and at the moment I'm fortunate enough to be in the position to to get involved