I've just had an estate agent round to value our flat (first of 3 so not got a full picture yet) but he has based his valuation on what we paid for it in 2007 because 'the market is pretty much back to where it was'. However he isn't taking into account any of the work we've had done. It had never been modernised since the building was converted back in the early 80's so we gutted it and added new everything and also knocked though the kitchen and extended it out. long story short, it is far from the flat that was on the market back then.
I feel he's under valued it by around £25K based on what another flat is currently on the market for in the same building.
He has said 'but that was for £125K in '07 and is now listed for the same' - but it was bought done up & to a lesser standard than ours! I'm not after fortunes & we would consider offers but 20% is a heck of a lot?!
I want to cry because we so badly need to move to a bigger place with our LO