Will try to keep this short...
Am looking for a house in a specific location (for ds secondary schooling and my work). Am currently renting in that location but really want to buy. Have always wanted to live in an old house but have always ended up taking the 'safe option' of a modern house (partly because my dad is a real doom-mongerer!). I'm now buying by myself (bit complicated - dh's son is at agricultural college in the next county so dh needs to buy there). We're doing weekends together, weeks apart. Anyway...
Very limited housing stock to choose from. Have offered on 2 modern(ish) properties but had both rejected (neither vendor has decided if they really want to move but are testing the market to see if they get a high price). Only other house in my budget (well within) is 150+ yr old cottage. Have taken a builder around and made offer based on likely costs of maintenance that has been accepted. I also have the budget and will need to add a conservatory. Because it will come off an extension, it will need planning permission. I also want to have a full structural survey (had a good chat to a surveyor I know and he will do it for me). I can get planning advice re the conservatory too but cost of survey and planning advice is about £850, which is a lot to shell out given that the purchase might not even go through.
I really like the cottage, despite no garage or parking, and I know I would enjoy the character quirks. But...old properties can be moneypits. So...
Do I go for it accepting there might be a few problems but being forewarned with survey and planning advice or do I take the safe, boring option and carry on renting until another modern box (with all its conveniences) comes up that I can afford?
Anyone followed their heart and regretted it?