When DH retires in a couple of years he'll receive a lump sum as part of his pension. Looking at current savings rates we think it's going to be best to buy property with it- either some of it or 75%.
I can see 3 options: trade up from our average 4-bed modern house (in a very nice location) to a character property in the same location if one came up. This would take up most of the money as there is a big jump from what we have now to something older and/or bigger. We've always wanted an older house and bigger garden but the downside is more maintenance in old age. The upside is a bigger family home for DCs to visit and a good investment ( we live SE in commuter belt.) But nothing may come on the market.
2nd option is to buy a small holiday cottage in an area we visit and use it for ourselves but maybe rent out in the longer term when we are too old to use it. (Or sell it.) Downside is as an investment it would not increase so much being further north.
3rd option is to buy a flat or small house locally and buy to let. Prices will rise as we are commuter belt- unless there is a crash. Downside is- capital gains tax? Hastle of managing it as landlords.
All the above would be left to our 2 DCs or sold and they'd inherit.
Which would be your choice?