Hi
We are looking to buy a 2 bed flat (to let out) which we noticed on the first viewing had a strange layout where there was no "family" bathroom and both bedrooms had an ensuite each - the bedroom door looked like it had been moved to enclose the access to the bathroom inside the bedroom, but we weren't sure if it had been built like that.
We discussed with the estate agent that we'd like to move the door back to make a bathroom that was accessible to all, even if both bedroom doors were closed.
We asked our solicitor to find out what consents were needed as part of the lease to make internal alterations, and he has been struggling to get an answer from the management company or the vendor's solicitor.
We got the solicitor's report this week and find out that the vendor admits that the bedroom door was moved, and that she didn't get consent from the management company for this alteration (she also stated on the Leasehold Information Form that there had never been any alterations - very misleading!).
We are now reluctant to proceed as we feel we are open to bearing the risk, when we ask for consent to move the door back, of the management company then finding out the original alteration was made without consent and making us essentially in breach of the lease, being fined or at least having more charges to pay for retrospective consent, and then needing consent to move the door back to its original position.
Has anyone any experience of making internal changes inside a leasehold flat, and the implications of lack of consent?
We don't want to make a mountain out of a molehill, but feel the vendor didn't follow due process and we don't want to take the consequences for their error.
Many thanks if you bothered to get this far - this purchase malarky is so frustrating sometimes, isn't it?