Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Property/DIY

Join our Property forum for renovation, DIY, and house selling advice.

Is it usual to take the carpets?

11 replies

Baubleswithdiamonds · 17/12/2012 10:52

We've bought two properties and each time the carpets were included. It hadn't really occurred to me that they might not be (unless specified upfront eg, when looking round the house).

Just seen the fixtures and fittings form and the carpets have not been ticked as included - this would be a big expense if we had to replace them. Would it be reasonable to renogotiate the price on the basis that we thought the carpets were included (if they are not - it could be an oversight)?

OP posts:
PigletJohn · 17/12/2012 11:02

it is usual but not obligatory.

In most cases the carpets will not fit the new house, and will not repay the cost of removing and refitting them. Sometimes they are so old or horrible that either the new or the old owner throws them in the skip.

if they are new and/or expensive, or the old owner is barmy, the old owner may take them.

ask.
They will not be woirth much to a sensible seller.

PigletJohn · 17/12/2012 11:03

it is usual but not obligatory to leave them
I meant.

Baubleswithdiamonds · 17/12/2012 11:08

Cheers.

I've met the vendors and they seem nice and normal so hopefully no barminess involved! Some of the carpets look new and are in large rooms so I guess could be moved. I'm mainly concerned about the hall & stairs seagrass stuff - surely that couldn't be moved easily?

I've asked my solicitor to check but just wanted to get an idea of what is usual custom.

OP posts:
lalalonglegs · 17/12/2012 12:27

Some divvy vendors try to use things such as carpets as a bartering tool to get extra money but I've only ever known it lead to a stand-off (buyers saying, "we're not paying for them so take them out" and vendors not actually wanting them in the first place) that sours the whole transaction and makes everyone feel they are being ripped off (the buyers more justifiably than the vendors, imo).

Baubleswithdiamonds · 17/12/2012 13:05

That's what I'm afraid may happen lala-in which case, as you say, we will stand our ground and see if they take them, but I will be rather irritated, especially about the hall/stair carpet.

Still hoping it's an oversight...

OP posts:
specialsubject · 17/12/2012 13:09

let's hope so - carpets are expensive but there is absolutely no point in taking them to a new house, they won't fit. Ditto curtains.

aimum · 17/12/2012 13:19

Our vendors wanted to take several carpets, curtain and poles and the 20-year old kitchen units. We pointed out that we did not want the house if it was stripped bare at which point the vendor took most curtains (they left the front facing rooms intact) and 1 carpet but decided to leave the kitchen, pmsl.

wendybird77 · 17/12/2012 17:11

When we moved out of our last place I took the curtains and poles. I had no idea it wasn't customary to do so here. (grin) We now have them in our annex. I would never take carpet and did leave the custom blinds.

usualsuspect3 · 17/12/2012 17:17

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Rhubarbgarden · 17/12/2012 18:04

Our vendors took the pond with them Hmm

harbingerofdoom · 17/12/2012 18:22

I've always left carpets and always been left carpets. In both cases skip fodder (well some) Grin

The weird vendor, we were unfortunate enough to encounter, wanted to take the oak panelling from the hall. This didn't bode well..what else would they take without our knowledge? We walked away

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread