Bit of a rambling explanaiton to follow so please bear with me.
We're buying a new-build from Redrow. The sale fell through with the previous buyers so it came with a few "extras" like turf and carpets, and on part exchange with our house. They valued our house at £10k lower than our asking price, but took £10k off the asking price of the new build (£240k reduced to £230k).
We got a mortgage advisor to source a mortgage for us and the lender we chose sent out a valuer who Redrow tell us is "notorious" for low valuations. He valued the new build at £215k, and Redrow didn't have enough comparable sales to convince the company to lend over that amount.
We have now instructed a second valuer who valued on Thursday but we are yet to find out what value he's put on the new build.
What I'm sure of now is where I stand if the second valuation comes in at £230K. Do I have to totally disregard the first valuation or do I have ground to haggle on the price? If it comes in under £230K, then I'd assume I could ask them to meet us half way.
H thinks if it's the asking price, then we're paying that regardless of the first valuation. My feeling is that the first valuation is as valid a product as the second.
Thanks for sticking with me! What do you think?