We have received a letter from our landlord informing us that they intend to put the property up for sale at the end of our tenancy on 14th October 2012. They suggested that if we are interested in buying the flat then we should put in an offer avoiding estate agents fees (I’m assuming this is really a saving on their part). We did not intend to buy in the area we are renting and were planning to buy closer to my partner’s parents in spring 2013. We were not keen to move for another 6 months while we saved more towards the deposit (we will meet our deposit target in Nov 2012).
Before we can respond to their letter with our polite ‘No thanks’ I assume they will serve us with a S21 notice immediately on receipt of our letter. To buy us more time I was planning on taking a long time before I reply to the letter; and when I do reply I would suggest that they sell the property with us still occupying it preventing them from having a void period (neighbour tells us that the flat was up for sale for a long time before they rented it to us) and serving us with the S21 once they get an offer. However, I have heard selling a property with a ‘sitting tenant’ can put people off and also complicate things.
Selfishly I am hoping the case would be the same as what the neighbour says. That way we save more towards the deposit, saves us moving twice in 12 months (I panic at the thought of moving the wardrobe! Twice) and all the fees associated with moving to another rented house.
I guess my question is what are the implications of selling the flat with us still in it on the proviso that we will move out when it’s sold? What problems will the landlord face if they let us stay while marketing the flat?