So my buyer has had a full structural survey, CCTV cameras down all the drains (no problems found anywhere) and is now asking me to buy indemnity insurance for a wall which was removed in the 1970's (three owners before me).
I'm becoming more than a little tired of this now, it seems that every question I answer, every certificate I provide, every last minute survey I agree to is met with another question or reason that we can't get to exchanging contracts.
Should I just tell them to take a hike, I'm pretty fed up with them today. I don't need to sell the house to move. I'm just seeing them raise issue after issue and I could just pop this place up for rent, and do a quick exchange on the chain free house I'm buying.
Is this normal buyer behaviour or am I being messed with? With the house I'm buying I've just accepted the survey and told the solicitor to proceed. I don't bloody care about the drains or the building regs for the extension that was built in 1980 - surely after 30 years it's not enforceable anyway! Maybe I should start asking all this stuff too???
Seriously - what is normal with regards to survey/indemnity/liability these days? Did you get CCTV down the drains and insist on building regs for a wall that was torn down 30 years ago? I reckon if the house was going to fall down due to said wall - it would have happened by now!
End of rant, can someone offer any words of wisdom?