We are renovating a 1930s house. Creating an open plan kitchen/dining/family space with bi-fold doors onto the garden. (Have a separate grown up living room). Got to decide on flooring. We have underfloor heating going in (so real wood not an option).
Initially we were going to do engineered wood throughout the downstairs. Then I had a wobble about the suitability of wood (engineered or otherwise) for the kitchen. Practical problems:
- Keeping it clean - apparently only can be damp mopped - does not mix well with water - how feasible is that with a dog and 2 DCs aged 4 & 6? A damp mop to remove weetabix? Really?
- Scratching...dog doesn't tend to run about much inside - but would the mix of dog & wood be practical? She can scratch at the door a little
- Underfloor hearing doesn't work as efficiently as with stone/ceramic etc
- Would the space end up looking a bit "woody". (Going for off-white shaker kitchen, black esse range and granite worksurfaces which is all fine with the wood - but dining area/family room would have oak dresser/tables/bookshelves.)
So we decided to go for stone/tile floor instead. Been looking, got samples, been browsing. Been tearing pages manically out of vastly overpriced magazines. But I cannot get a picture in my head of how it would look. I have yet to find a tile that makes me think "perfect." Or even "that will do". DH dead against cream (I may be able to talk him round but is it worth it if ultimately he hates it) which is possible the look I would like most (Limestone, textured).
So, sorry about length. Do I do what I imagine in my heart for the space to look like...wood...and sod the practicalities and all the excuses I am making up to not do it.....Or do I go for the pragmatic choice and just keep looking until I actually find a tile I like.
Is wood (engineered) really so impractial - am I just making up problems which aren't really there. Or would I regret it?
Please help.