Ok, knowing that DH, I and the kids are busting out of our flat, and that we're finding it hard to sell with all our stuff in it, my mum has managed to convince my dad that it makes sense for us to rent his small 3 bed house that he's been using for his business for the last 20 years. It is time he retired, the business hasn't been making any money, and so the house has essentially become his pottering shed. This way seems to make sense to everybody - this way, my parents get some regular income from the house, without having to sell it, we get somewhere to live that, although it's small, will be on the ground floor and so we'll have a garden and a dining room, as opposed to having one big lounge/diner, which I hate.
The problem is, is that they want us to do it up, and then when we've sold the house we're both putting money into an extension.
DH and I are concerned that if we're going to be putting money into an extension, and if we're going to be accepting it in a state that most agencies wouldn't accept (garage roof leaking, taking sinks out etc) that we really shouldn't be paying market rental prices for it. Do you think we'd BU to insist that we deduct whatever money we paid to decorate it off the rent?
Of course, not having sold the house, we're hoping that emptying the place will attract a buyer quickly, but can only think of taking a mortgage holiday for 3 months, and then renting. Are we being foolish? We're almost completely sure that my DSM would defer the rent, but obviously we'll be paying 2 lots of council tax, won't we? Arrrrghhghgh - they only said we could rent it two days ago, and it's already doing our nut in!