Please settle a 'discussion' between self and Dh..
One of us believes it is better to stay in the house because it might take a while to sell, but just keep it tidy and nip out with dog and children when EA wants to bring someone for viewings. This means keeping the house in a perpetual state of readiness, though not fully 'staged' as we'll still need things like dog beds (ours are smart looking ones made from wicker) and wellingtons for everyday life, and DD2s cot in the DDs bedroom, keeping the small table in the 'dining' bit of the kitchen/ diner to leave room for the DDs low chair.
pros: we can be more patient about selling
cons: it will mean near constant tidying, cleaning and re-touching of paintwork
One of us thinks it would be better to move out - either into a one bed bungalow we can borrow, (would be doable though pokey to say the least!) or into the middle storey of my parents house (4 rooms and a bathroom) and hope for a quicker sale, leaving the house fully staged (ie, no sign there ever was a dog in the house, no extra cot in the girls bedroom (just the single bed and her writing desk where the cot is) flowers, dining table set up with place settings..etc)
pros: would just need to pick up post and dust, and mow the lawn in terms of maintenance.
cons: more pressure to get sold so that normal life can resume, streeses of whichever alternative accomodation we choose.
which do you think is the better tactic?
I hope i haven't slanted my favoured option too much!