We have a property that we used to live in and now rent out to a tenant who has been in from the start. The tenant looks after the property well, has no designs on moving elsewhere and aside from a couple of missing rents early on in the process which he has now paid back has not caused us any issues. The tenant is a DSS tenant and has his rent paid directly to the letting agents every fourth Friday (used to get the cash in hand but due to the earlier issues this was changed).
The problem we are having is that despite the money being paid by the council every fourth week, we are still sometimes left without regular rental payments, it is now 6 weeks and counting since we had a rental payment as the letting agency appears to be run by clowns. (Actually it is run by clowns, we know the people on a more personal basis and they are useless). They keep saying the tenant is not paying his shortfall but I have spoken to both the tenant and the council who have both confirmed that there is not a shortfall to be made up and presumaly the issue lies in that although the council pays rent four weekly we charge it PCM, meaning the letting agents get 13 payments per year whereas we only get 12. I have a feeling the letting agents are trying to bamboozle the tenant into paying a small shortfall and thus leaving themselves one full rental payment per year to tuck into their bank account. I can't be sure but I believe this to be the case.
Anyway, what we would like to do is cut the letting agent out of the picture, get the rent paid by the council directly to us and stopping any issues we might have. What I want to now is whether this is feasable and what we need to do from a legal POV in order to make sure everything is above board and we are protected as much as we can be.