We have had a carpet fitted in several places in our house, including the hall, that is different from the sample we ordered from.
It is lighter and indeed seems to be from a different colour range (more yellow in tone than the grey we had chosen) and appears to be the same colour throughout, rather than the more forgiving slightly differentiated colour (small, pale flecks) we had chosen - important as it is in the entrance hall.
The supplier sent the sample we had ordered from together with an offcut from what was fitted to the manufacturer for analysis. The manufacturer has apparently said that the carpet that has been fitted was "within tolerance" for the range, but that the sample we ordered from was not.
We have been offered a sum of money by the manufacturer as an "allowance" on the basis that what we ordered could never be supplied by them as they don't make it. The allowance is not enough to pay for getting even just the hall recarpeted - as a fraction of the cost of buying and fitting the carpet in its entirety it is under 10%.
We aren't happy, as the carpet is too light and simply not what we ordered. Should we insist that the supplier (with whom we have the contract) supply us with a carpet in the right colour/same kind of quality, even if it is from a different manufacturer - or reject the carpet entirely and get a complete refund (and then have the hassle of having no carpet and having to choose again, get it fitted again, have the fitters chip more paintwork while fitting/removing etc) or just accept the allowance (or press for more) and the fact the carpet will be trashed?
We are not even sure that the supplier labelled the right sample, as it seems odd that a carpet sample could be given if the manufacturer doesn't make it!
Thoughts, advice v much appreciated. I just haven't got the strength for prolonged arguments with these people - but at the same time am quite annoyed that we ended up with the wrong thing.