Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

Private school

Connect with fellow parents here about private schooling. Parents seeking advice on boarding school can vist our dedicated forum.

OLA Abingdon

116 replies

Beetlemamma · 07/01/2025 22:10

Can any parents who have children at OLA Abingdon, shed any light on the current head leaving the school? I have been told he is moving on. My daughter is registered, to hopefully, attend in September 2025. I have also heard the school is financially unstable!! Please help, seriously worried mother!!!

OP posts:
Are your children’s vaccines up to date?
AFewGoodMen · 16/08/2025 20:13

Sadlythingsaregrim · 16/08/2025 19:16

The leadership team were reassuring the parents about financial stability of OLA back in March. The former COO/Bursar has reassured many parents of the financial stability in the last few months. This obviously was not the case and people have been misled. How can this be right?
It is dreadful that nobody can be held to account. When I was really unhappy with the governors I found there was no way to object/question their actions or report concerns about governance. The only way to satisfy our concern was to take our child out of the school. I thought the ISI or Diocesan inspections would have highlighted problems but they were both a whitewash.

What a joke. That leadership team were a real disappointment. They stepped into those roles and abandoned their responsibilities for self-interest. Once they had the big titles, they seemed to disappear—suddenly nowhere to be found. Pastoral care ended up in a mess and I heard some students were running completely wild during their exams. Too busy pointing the finger to do their jobs apparently. Strikes one week, VAT the other. Maybe they just weren't up to the task and were too proud to admit it. The bursar especially, though he somehow excelled at looking after his own finances so who knows!
They surely must have known what was going on with the money. Unless the bursar really did manage to deceive them? And if that’s the case, how incompetent does it make them look for falling for it?

BloeJoggs · 16/08/2025 21:06

This school did not simply close because of VAT or poor management - it collapsed under years of declining standards and poor staffing choices. The excellent, original teachers who built its reputation were replaced by staff who were often unprofessional, dismissive of children, and unwilling to follow policy. Concerns were brushed aside, parents misled, and the wellbeing of pupils came second to staff ego. Children’s own video and audio recordings, unbeknown to the teachers, sadly confirmed this unprofessional behaviour.

During the strikes, parents were led to believe their children were being taught. In reality, many were handed a workbook and left to “self-teach,” with priority given only to one group of exam students, while the rest were overlooked for months. GCSE science students went months without qualified subject teachers, something families were never made aware of until far too late. Mock results were presented in a way that disguised the scale of the problem, leaving parents with a false sense of progress.

My own child had been thriving before joining this school, but quickly fell behind due to the lack of proper teaching and support. It is the brightest children who have managed to get results here - but even they would no doubt have done better if they had been taught to the standard one expects from a private school.

Yes, poor leadership played its part (even with the newer team who are/were very inexperienced and ineffective), but the conduct of many staff accelerated the downfall. Yes there were a few good teachers but they were few and far between. A school cannot succeed if teachers show little integrity, professionalism, or care for pupils. Sadly, that was the case here - and the real tragedy is that many children failed through no fault of their own, left unable to achieve their full potential. The final GCSE and A-Level results will no doubt reveal just how badly students were failed.

doglover90 · 16/08/2025 23:40

BloeJoggs · 16/08/2025 21:06

This school did not simply close because of VAT or poor management - it collapsed under years of declining standards and poor staffing choices. The excellent, original teachers who built its reputation were replaced by staff who were often unprofessional, dismissive of children, and unwilling to follow policy. Concerns were brushed aside, parents misled, and the wellbeing of pupils came second to staff ego. Children’s own video and audio recordings, unbeknown to the teachers, sadly confirmed this unprofessional behaviour.

During the strikes, parents were led to believe their children were being taught. In reality, many were handed a workbook and left to “self-teach,” with priority given only to one group of exam students, while the rest were overlooked for months. GCSE science students went months without qualified subject teachers, something families were never made aware of until far too late. Mock results were presented in a way that disguised the scale of the problem, leaving parents with a false sense of progress.

My own child had been thriving before joining this school, but quickly fell behind due to the lack of proper teaching and support. It is the brightest children who have managed to get results here - but even they would no doubt have done better if they had been taught to the standard one expects from a private school.

Yes, poor leadership played its part (even with the newer team who are/were very inexperienced and ineffective), but the conduct of many staff accelerated the downfall. Yes there were a few good teachers but they were few and far between. A school cannot succeed if teachers show little integrity, professionalism, or care for pupils. Sadly, that was the case here - and the real tragedy is that many children failed through no fault of their own, left unable to achieve their full potential. The final GCSE and A-Level results will no doubt reveal just how badly students were failed.

It sounds like the staff had very little choice except to go with whatever leadership dictated. I'm not saying that every teacher was brilliant but these are people who have been left without jobs at no notice, and now an anonymous parent is making claims on a public forum that the majority of teachers were lacking in professionalism and integrity, without any evidence, and the teachers have no way to refute this. And the fact that students were making recordings without consent is disgusting and should not be condoned by their parents!

BloeJoggs · 17/08/2025 15:10

doglover90 · 16/08/2025 23:40

It sounds like the staff had very little choice except to go with whatever leadership dictated. I'm not saying that every teacher was brilliant but these are people who have been left without jobs at no notice, and now an anonymous parent is making claims on a public forum that the majority of teachers were lacking in professionalism and integrity, without any evidence, and the teachers have no way to refute this. And the fact that students were making recordings without consent is disgusting and should not be condoned by their parents!

It sounds like you are from the school given your ‘default deny’ response and your presumptive remarks. What makes you think there is no proof and that teachers haven’t already been given the chance to defend themselves in school before it closed? Let’s not twist this to suit your narrative. No one was recording without consent- students had free time, they made social media videos, and a bit of extra footage got caught as it can do on occasions. End of story.

doglover90 · 18/08/2025 07:04

😂😂I'm clearly not from the school, I wouldn't be posting on mumsnet if I was out of a job with no notice. I am a teacher so I know what it's like to be in the profession.

MBAuck23 · 18/08/2025 13:24

Wow, this is heart breaking to hear - my friend was looking at Abingdon for this September but decided to study online with Highgrove in the end because she felt the quality of tuition would be higher - might be an option for any families who get stuck.

CandidViewer · 23/08/2025 22:18

Absolutely shocking leadership is 100% to blame. Teacher turnover around 50% for three years running meant parents lost confidence in the school and began to doubt how it was being run. Strikes highlighted this further, students leave, income for school drops, school closes. All this while COO is paying himself over 3x that of the most experienced teachers.

the solution was very simple, look after your staff. Instead they paid under market value, changed contracts at will, forced out or fired anyone who challenged COO and new headteacher.

disgraceful.

Thetruthtakestime · 15/10/2025 14:46

Very interesting comments. Firstly people who were sacked under the new leadership team had either safeguarding or gross misconduct issues. I guess you are one of them.

Thetruthtakestime · 15/10/2025 14:53

Secondly, the new leadership team found out only a few days before letters were issues and they did not get paid either. The ones to blame are the governors who mislead everyone and let everyone down during the strike. They thought that the new LT team would fail and bear the blame but it turned out to be the opposite. Those Ladies fought until the very end and deserve respect for it.

Thetruthtakestime · 15/10/2025 17:23

You certainly drove the school to the ground with your strike.

AlwaysOxford · 16/10/2025 08:53

Let me help truthtakestime with a correction. Terrible dodgy governors appointed an unqualified bursar with a huge ambition for himself. They allowed him to run amok, and they appointed the shocking under qualified Gibbons for a head. He bullied and demoralised staff and caused the staff to leave. Meanwhile the bursar made himself “supreme leader” and carried on digging a financial hole. The staff left because they were bullied and discriminated against and had to sign NDAs to cover up the mess. Governors ignored this whilst parents voted with their feet. School was run into the ground not by the staff or the parents leaving, or even VAT, but by terrible decisions and neglect by the governors and the bursar. There we are I have fixed it for you!!!
Ps not a staff member but a parent of 9yrs at OLA!

Sadlythingsaregrim · 16/10/2025 12:46

AlwaysOxford is correct. Gibbons was incompetent, the governors were negligent and the bursar was too big for his boots.
After making many complaints to the governors, who ignored us, we voted with our feet. Nothing to do with VAT. If you treat your staff like 5h1t and there is massive turnover then parents withdraw their kids ….its not rocket science to work out how things are going to pan out. NDAs for leaving staff is outrageous and clearly there was something to hide.

Sadlythingsaregrim · 16/10/2025 19:33

It was already dying. Shame on you to blame the teachers - look for the reason for the massive staff turnover and then think why parents took their kids out of the school. Then ask yourself where the buck stopped and can think you think of three names? - El Turk, Gibbons and Karian.

GAADaughter78 · 17/10/2025 18:22

Thetruthtakestime · 15/10/2025 14:46

Very interesting comments. Firstly people who were sacked under the new leadership team had either safeguarding or gross misconduct issues. I guess you are one of them.

Oh wow, that's really worrying. Knew things were going on and a couple of teachers were in trouble but didn't know it was that bad. Which teachers were sacked? What gross misconduct? I never heard about this!

CandidViewer · 17/10/2025 19:44

Not “one of them”, not a teacher - just one of the many parents left in the lurch. If you really believe the nonsense you’re spouting then please explain why leadership were nowhere to be seen on results days? Why no support was offered and we had to resort to contacting teachers directly to get information? Why the school categorically stated the financial position is viable and the schools future is safe? Dropping the announcement in August was disgusting and gave little chance for parents, children, teachers and staff to find new schools.

As the previous poster has asked, and if your statement of safe guarding and gross misconduct is true, please do share with as the staff I’ve spoken to don’t share the same view as you had from the ivory towers.

ThisJollyPearlDreamer · 17/10/2025 20:26

@CandidViewer your comment is spot on!

ThisJollyPearlDreamer · 17/10/2025 20:28

@Thetruthtakestime or maybe the ladies in charge didn't have enough experience to run a school? As parents we find hard to believe that the Head was unaware of what was going on!

NotBuyingItMate · 17/10/2025 21:05

Thetruthtakestime · 15/10/2025 14:53

Secondly, the new leadership team found out only a few days before letters were issues and they did not get paid either. The ones to blame are the governors who mislead everyone and let everyone down during the strike. They thought that the new LT team would fail and bear the blame but it turned out to be the opposite. Those Ladies fought until the very end and deserve respect for it.

Yeah and you're clearly one of those ladies. Or one of that leadership team. Which one? The Headmistress? The Head of English? Why don't you just admit the blame lies with the people you sucked up to. Which means it lies with you too. Bet these accusations are nothing more than a bunch of extra baseless reasons to dismiss staff brave enough to stand up for the kids and the parents. Who met with us at results day though? Sure wasn't the Headmistress or the governors was it? Too busy throwing a pity party?

It wasn't the strikes and it wasn't the teachers. It was Prav, Freddie, the new chair and every single toadie in that leadership team who let them fiddle us and the hardworking teachers while Rome burned.

No wonder the good staff went on strike dealing with the likes of them!

Stop rewriting history and consign yourself to it instead. For everyone's sake.

Sadlythingsaregrim · 17/10/2025 22:34

Too many lies and nonsense from the Governors who wouldn’t admit their mistake in employing Gibbons who was the most disastrous, incompetent headteacher and obviously so, from day one. He bullied the staff and then the COO made people sign NDAs when they left. What a den of vipers. A great school was destroyed and I am glad it shut. Those governors should be barred. There was a revolving door of teachers some who only lasted weeks. Safeguarding? Maybe there were some issues but I suspect that speaking truth to power was considered gross misconduct???? Who knows?

CandidViewer · 18/10/2025 06:04

Sadlythingsaregrim · 17/10/2025 22:34

Too many lies and nonsense from the Governors who wouldn’t admit their mistake in employing Gibbons who was the most disastrous, incompetent headteacher and obviously so, from day one. He bullied the staff and then the COO made people sign NDAs when they left. What a den of vipers. A great school was destroyed and I am glad it shut. Those governors should be barred. There was a revolving door of teachers some who only lasted weeks. Safeguarding? Maybe there were some issues but I suspect that speaking truth to power was considered gross misconduct???? Who knows?

Completely agree, incompetence mixed with corruption. I haven’t heard of the NDAs until now but isn’t surprising - I wondered why the teachers leaving stayed quiet, I guess a payout and NDA explains it.

Though I will state that Gibbons wasn’t the only, nor main, source of the problems - he was simply the scape goat of the bursar. New Head did nothing to improve parents confidence and was used as a puppet to remove or force out many teachers, largely well respected and beloved by pupils (including my own). She was always very dismissive, angry and instead of working to improve just pointed fingers and said ‘what am I supposed to do’. To agree with previous posts, how the HEADTEACHER didn’t know what was happening in her own school is telling - either pure incompetence or corruption.

The main ‘crime’ apparent was to stand up for education and treatment of all involved at the school. To speak of gross misconduct/safeguarding is a joke. Whatever happened to the member of leadership that left a staff members personal contact details (then used by a pupil) openly available in a classroom of unsupervised children? @Thetruthtakestime

NotBuyingItMate · 18/10/2025 06:52

CandidViewer · 18/10/2025 06:04

Completely agree, incompetence mixed with corruption. I haven’t heard of the NDAs until now but isn’t surprising - I wondered why the teachers leaving stayed quiet, I guess a payout and NDA explains it.

Though I will state that Gibbons wasn’t the only, nor main, source of the problems - he was simply the scape goat of the bursar. New Head did nothing to improve parents confidence and was used as a puppet to remove or force out many teachers, largely well respected and beloved by pupils (including my own). She was always very dismissive, angry and instead of working to improve just pointed fingers and said ‘what am I supposed to do’. To agree with previous posts, how the HEADTEACHER didn’t know what was happening in her own school is telling - either pure incompetence or corruption.

The main ‘crime’ apparent was to stand up for education and treatment of all involved at the school. To speak of gross misconduct/safeguarding is a joke. Whatever happened to the member of leadership that left a staff members personal contact details (then used by a pupil) openly available in a classroom of unsupervised children? @Thetruthtakestime

I suppose the point of NDAs is that if they exist you're not going to hear much! Guess we're hearing it now though. "The truth takes time," to use the name of our not-so-anonymous poster on this thread, despite their attempts at rewriting it. Maybe some of the teachers whose names they dragged through the dirt in public could tell us what REALLY happened. Bet there's some fun stories there!

Totally agree. New Headmistress needed to stand up to Prav and the governors to save the school. Instead she jumped into bed with them and another round of Stalinist purges ensued. And you know what? Those people, whether they were already forced out or were still fighting when the place went under, they were there on results day putting on brave faces for the kids and celebrating the kids' achievements. Where was she?

Not surprised about the member of leadership getting off scot-free. Bet they'll get glowing references from the COO while other, good, staff get (got?) shafted.

Sadlythingsaregrim · 18/10/2025 09:17

As I reflect on what happened at OLA, it’s very clear what the issues were - poor governance, leadership and COO plus a load of lies. However what I can’t understand is why they behaved as they did and for what reasons? I am baffled. It reminds me of doing business simulations when I was a management trainee - you were playing a game really.
This was not a game, it was people’s lives and futures. The perpetrators should not be allowed to be in similar positions ever again.
If you were setting out to get a school shut down, then copying what El Turk, Karian and Gibbons did would be a good place to start.
Why did they do this?

Thetruthtakestime · 18/10/2025 10:23

Dear Dr W. You are doing a poor job in hiding yourself.

Thetruthtakestime · 18/10/2025 10:36

The lower school was wonderful and there were some amazing teachers in the secondary school too. I met the LT team during the strike and must say I was looking forward to the change. What I don t understand is why so much had been prepared for September to suddenly close down the school. I had bought uniforms for my children, I lost my deposits and had the stress to find a school two weeks before the start of the year. Where is the money gone? Gibbons disappeared suddenly, the COO resigned in July and the governors have been hiding? they have to explain themselves to the parents, children and whole staff.

Sadlythingsaregrim · 18/10/2025 11:35

I am not trying to hide. I made my feelings known to the school, tried to get things back on track and voted with my feet. I didn’t just moan on Mumsnet. The Truth hurts.