I've just been to a meeting at the Junior School my DS2 will attend from Sept. No surprises for me, as DS1 is already there. However, some of the Mums were outraged at the uniform policy.
The colours are the same as the infants, but the infants wear poloshirts and sweat shirts, whereas the juniors have shirt, tie, jumper.
The contentious issue was that the jumpers must be an unusual colour (the infants can choose the odd colour or grey) which can only be purchased from the school.
They are good quality, was well, need little ironing and cost £7.75 each. Ties are £1.25. To me that's an excellent idea and saves all sorts of hassle, plus means the children are smart and there's no competition over who's got what etc. The rest of the uniform is standard school colours and can be purchased anywhere.
The complaints were that the jumper's too expensive and girls won't want to wear a jumper (cardigans not available and impossible to buy in the right colour elsewhere).
IMO, it's small issue and if you're going to send your child to the school, you support the school. I really don't get the "she won't want..." Not her choice surely?
Do you think it's an unreasonable policy? We're not in an affluent area, this isn't a "good" school keeping the riffraff out with a strict uniform policy, but in the year since they introduced it (used to be same as infants) there has been a marked improvement in behaviour (of the children if not the parents