Are your children’s vaccines up to date?

Set a reminder

Please or to access all these features

Primary education

Join our Primary Education forum to discuss starting school and helping your child get the most out of it.

Current year 1 classes

70 replies

Sunglassesevenintherain · 09/04/2026 21:56

My daughter is in Year 1 at primary school and has been really unhappy at school. She is quite sensitive (she does have some SEN) and finds her class too much as there are a lot of disruptive and boisterous kids. I’ve started looking at other options, but a friend who works with children, though in a different borough warned me that in her area the current Year 1 classes all have a reputation for being quite unsettled and challenging. She said this is linked to children in this year group having been born during lockdown/Covid.
It made me worry whether moving schools might not improve things if it’s a broader issue across this age group.
I'm looking at schools next week but
I’d really appreciate hearing if others have found similar or if your children are settled and happy in Year 1?

OP posts:
Are your children’s vaccines up to date?
Elariakopiethat · 12/04/2026 10:12

bunnyvsmonkey · 12/04/2026 09:11

My ds is not seen as needing it 'enough'. My guess is funding is only available for those in highest need. I do know a family have a completely non-verbal 9 year old and they've just been offered 6 appointments with SALT after 6 years on the register. 6 appointments! For a completely non verbal child. So I get that my ds who can speak but just can't form most of his words correctly is not a priority. He bumbles along ok. He gets angry and frustrated by it so we try to help him at home but we don't really know what we are doing!

That's crazy. Really sorry to hear.

I had just wondered if provision before and after covid were different of so why.

At this rate, you could do a university degree in SALT yourself and try and help your dc.

It's really outrageous when speaking and commenting are so essential for healthy, well-being and learning.

I suppose rpiahte SALT is too expensive or not readily available?

Hohumitsreallyallthereis · 12/04/2026 10:14

These kids were babies during lockdown. It’s bizarre they are worse than those who were toddlers or preschoolers.

BoleynMemories13 · 12/04/2026 11:50

Sunglassesevenintherain · 11/04/2026 23:06

This essay is excellent, thank you. I totally see the perfect storm here. We try and read daily and we have family time but we also struggle with screen time even though we don’t have iPads and try and stay away from the tv that feels addictive. But it feels impossible when me and my DH have work calls and have long days etc :
I also completely see about the unrealistic goals set for kids. My DD missed a bit of school in reception (not loads but enough) but is also very young for her year yet the system expects her to be keeping up with kids nearly a year older and it’s causing her to feel out of her depth when sat at a desk. Shes not disruptive in class at all, but when she gets home, she melts down and is very unhappy.

If she's masking in school and having meltdowns at home it is possible she could be neurodiverse. It often presents differently in girls, with masking very common. It's a shame the school don't seem willing to support with behaviour that is seen at home, as it doesn't mean the problems aren't there and you don't need support (young girls who mask in KS1 often find it harder to cope as they get older, so the earlier they get involved the better). Maybe a new school wouldn't be the worse idea if you can find one with a more supportive SENCO (no guarantees you'll find a calmer class for her though, unfortunately).

Good luck

BoleynMemories13 · 12/04/2026 12:10

DingleDungle · 11/04/2026 23:12

This reads a lot like AI-generated style generalisations. For a start, parents spending less time with kids because they are working is a) not something that would particularly affect current year 1s and b) isn't true. The data is very clear that working parents actually spend much more quality time than in previous generations. Yes in the 50s women would more often be at home but they would not be at home playing with their kids for hours!

I agree with PP that this thread is confirmation bias and anecdata. In my kids' school it's year 5 that is the difficult year. 🙍

I'm confused why you would claim this is AI? I don't know whether to be offended that you thought I couldn't be bothered to summarise various theories myself (which actually took me a very long time), or flattered that you assume I know how to use AI! 😂 I can assure you it's not AI, I've never used AI in my life and wouldn't know how to even if I wanted to.

OP asked what theories people had, and I did my best to impartially summarise all the ones I've come across. I was careful not to impose my own personal opinions on each theory, until perhaps the last paragraph about me believing it's down to a mixture of factors and not just Covid, as many would claim.

The working parents factor isn't my own personal opinion as such, it's a theory. If you do want my own personal opinion on it, I think there is something in it, as I do with all the theories, but I definitely don't think it's the main factor affecting behaviour and performance at school. I would be very intrigued to read your 'data' for the following statement:-

For a start, parents spending less time with kids because they are working is a) not something that would particularly affect current year 1s and b) isn't true. The data is very clear that working parents actually spend much more quality time than in previous generations. Yes in the 50s women would more often be at home but they would not be at home playing with their kids for hours!

Your 'data' and personal opinion contradicts a lot of what we are currently seeing among our own parents at my school, where families are genuinely struggling to find time for down time with their children, let alone quality family time. There's no judgement on my part at all, this is life in 2026. Many parents don't have the luxury of the option of being a stay at home parent anymore. I'm definitely not going back as far as the 50s to a time where this was more common. We will have to agree to disagree that this won't have an affect on children, when all factors are considered (the linked increased in screen time when parents are juggling work, less time for quality communication, potentially less secure attachments etc), unless you can provide the 'data' to convince me otherwise.

Sloupt · 12/04/2026 17:05

BoleynMemories13 · 12/04/2026 12:10

I'm confused why you would claim this is AI? I don't know whether to be offended that you thought I couldn't be bothered to summarise various theories myself (which actually took me a very long time), or flattered that you assume I know how to use AI! 😂 I can assure you it's not AI, I've never used AI in my life and wouldn't know how to even if I wanted to.

OP asked what theories people had, and I did my best to impartially summarise all the ones I've come across. I was careful not to impose my own personal opinions on each theory, until perhaps the last paragraph about me believing it's down to a mixture of factors and not just Covid, as many would claim.

The working parents factor isn't my own personal opinion as such, it's a theory. If you do want my own personal opinion on it, I think there is something in it, as I do with all the theories, but I definitely don't think it's the main factor affecting behaviour and performance at school. I would be very intrigued to read your 'data' for the following statement:-

For a start, parents spending less time with kids because they are working is a) not something that would particularly affect current year 1s and b) isn't true. The data is very clear that working parents actually spend much more quality time than in previous generations. Yes in the 50s women would more often be at home but they would not be at home playing with their kids for hours!

Your 'data' and personal opinion contradicts a lot of what we are currently seeing among our own parents at my school, where families are genuinely struggling to find time for down time with their children, let alone quality family time. There's no judgement on my part at all, this is life in 2026. Many parents don't have the luxury of the option of being a stay at home parent anymore. I'm definitely not going back as far as the 50s to a time where this was more common. We will have to agree to disagree that this won't have an affect on children, when all factors are considered (the linked increased in screen time when parents are juggling work, less time for quality communication, potentially less secure attachments etc), unless you can provide the 'data' to convince me otherwise.

Edited

But why would something like working parents affect Y1s in particular? To be fair to the pp, I've also read in the past about parents spending less time with children in years gone by and even if you look back to the 90s children were left to fend for themselves a lot more than they are nowadays.

Sunglassesevenintherain · 12/04/2026 17:47

BoleynMemories13 · 12/04/2026 12:10

I'm confused why you would claim this is AI? I don't know whether to be offended that you thought I couldn't be bothered to summarise various theories myself (which actually took me a very long time), or flattered that you assume I know how to use AI! 😂 I can assure you it's not AI, I've never used AI in my life and wouldn't know how to even if I wanted to.

OP asked what theories people had, and I did my best to impartially summarise all the ones I've come across. I was careful not to impose my own personal opinions on each theory, until perhaps the last paragraph about me believing it's down to a mixture of factors and not just Covid, as many would claim.

The working parents factor isn't my own personal opinion as such, it's a theory. If you do want my own personal opinion on it, I think there is something in it, as I do with all the theories, but I definitely don't think it's the main factor affecting behaviour and performance at school. I would be very intrigued to read your 'data' for the following statement:-

For a start, parents spending less time with kids because they are working is a) not something that would particularly affect current year 1s and b) isn't true. The data is very clear that working parents actually spend much more quality time than in previous generations. Yes in the 50s women would more often be at home but they would not be at home playing with their kids for hours!

Your 'data' and personal opinion contradicts a lot of what we are currently seeing among our own parents at my school, where families are genuinely struggling to find time for down time with their children, let alone quality family time. There's no judgement on my part at all, this is life in 2026. Many parents don't have the luxury of the option of being a stay at home parent anymore. I'm definitely not going back as far as the 50s to a time where this was more common. We will have to agree to disagree that this won't have an affect on children, when all factors are considered (the linked increased in screen time when parents are juggling work, less time for quality communication, potentially less secure attachments etc), unless you can provide the 'data' to convince me otherwise.

Edited

Thank you @BoleynMemories13 i really do appreciate the time spent on this summery. It was very helpful

OP posts:
cramptramp · 12/04/2026 17:48

This isn’t true OP.

ClassicStripe · 12/04/2026 17:51

My current year ones are lovely. I was warned they wouldn’t be able to cope with Year 1 but I haven’t had any problems. It’s all about expectations.

BoleynMemories13 · 12/04/2026 18:05

Sloupt · 12/04/2026 17:05

But why would something like working parents affect Y1s in particular? To be fair to the pp, I've also read in the past about parents spending less time with children in years gone by and even if you look back to the 90s children were left to fend for themselves a lot more than they are nowadays.

Where have I said it would specify affect only Year 1 children?

It depends how you interpret this thread. If you're looking for theories as to why Year 1 are apparently struggling more than any other year group (you'll see from the replies that this isn't always the case), then no this wouldn't only affect Year 1 children. If you're looking for theories why children in general seem to be struggling to regulate themselves in schools these days (which does seem to be the general consensus and is definitely my own personal experience, as someone who has taught for 16 years now), lifestyles in the 2020s could play a part.

For whatever reason, young children are becoming increasingly more difficult to teach, for a variety of reasons. This thread has evolved from discussing just Year 1, to talking about current struggles in general among the primary age group compared to years gone by. This could be down to many many factors, of which the change in lifestyle when it comes to working parents and family dynamics in general COULD play a part.

I'm trying to put the focus on lifestyle changes, rather than working parents specifically, as I don't for one minute think the issues are simply because more parents are now working full time. You mention the 90s. In the 90s, children 'fending for themselves', as you put it, potentially looked like kids playing out with the rest of the neighborhood kids until the streetlights came on and it was time to go home for dinner, once parents had finished work. These days, the picture for many is more like sitting isolated on a device until dinner time, with 'dinner' often being snacky foods while still sitting in front of a screen. Family meal times are becoming a thing of the past for many.

It's the lifestyle changes that have the much bigger effect, not necessarily the fact parents are busy working. I'm not sure why a few people have really honed in on that and are determined to prove me wrong as I haven't actually said "kids are struggling to behave at school because their parents work full time". It really is not that blaxk and white and, once again, it is merely a theory some people have. It's not my own personal opinion.

landlordhell · 12/04/2026 18:29

Something I find is that more young chn are not at all put off poor behaviour in an adult/ teacher’s presence. There’s a lack of respect or fear( for want of a better word) of consequences.

Nix32 · 12/04/2026 18:38

@ClassicStripe That’s really insulting. We had 12 out of 60 children with high banding EHCPs last year. Really significant, severe needs that have an enormous impact on the rest of the class. It’s not just about expectations.

BoleynMemories13 · 12/04/2026 19:40

landlordhell · 12/04/2026 18:29

Something I find is that more young chn are not at all put off poor behaviour in an adult/ teacher’s presence. There’s a lack of respect or fear( for want of a better word) of consequences.

Edited

Yes, this is definitely my experience too in recent years. Of course we don't want young children to fear teachers, but they should fear getting into trouble. They should wish to avoid consequences.

Years back, most children looked to avoid getting into trouble at school and they certainly didn't want their parents to find out about it if they did. These days, most aren't at all bothered about either. The fact so many parents openly make excuses for the behaviour in front of their child, and don't ever bring in consequences at home for getting into trouble at school, really doesn't help. It's like we're fighting a losing battle to have our rules and boundaries respected by children and even parents in some cases.

Pigriver · 12/04/2026 19:54

My eldest is in Y5 and in both his school and the one I teach at this year group (and the ones above it) have been more affected by COVID than the younger years.
At my school then kids did no home learning and very, very few were in school as most have 1 sahp. At my son's school most were in (different demographic) but no access to early support services such as speech and language therapy. No interventions running and just taught the basic with no extra play or mixing, no extra curriculars, parties etc. The level of unsupported and undiagnosed SEN is huge.
Y1 were born just before COVID and it had all died down before they started school. Referral and HV checks had started up again. These kids do seem to have a shared attention span though, maybe due to screen time? My you gest and his friends all seem pretty 'normal'
Our current reception are the best we've had in years. My current nursery class has 50% SEND, 1 non verbal autism and the rest severe speech delays e.g. working at a handful of single words. Thankfully we only have 10 kids but even the 4 due to start, 2 have similar SEND

BoleynMemories13 · 12/04/2026 19:57

Nix32 · 12/04/2026 18:38

@ClassicStripe That’s really insulting. We had 12 out of 60 children with high banding EHCPs last year. Really significant, severe needs that have an enormous impact on the rest of the class. It’s not just about expectations.

I agree. Every class is different, depending on the individuals who make up that class.

Claiming it's just down to expectations totally dismisses the impact that individual children can have on the class as a whole sometimes.

curlyfriess · 12/04/2026 19:58

Why on earth would covid times cause issues in babies? Babies don't need socialising with lots of people, they don't need to see other babies - parents are enough. But parents need to put the effort in and that's where the issue is IMO. Parents would rather stick their kid in front of a screen than sing, play and read to them.

When DS was a baby we lived 3 hours away from any family and I didn't know anyone where we had moved to. It had no negative impact on him because I spent most of the day talking, singing, reading, taking him out for walks etc.

I was in Costa for 45 minutes yesterday and there was a dad their with his toddler in a pushchair. He poured some crisps in front of the child and then spent the whole time on his phone - didn't say one word to the child for 45 minutes. Then we wonder why kids have the issues they do. It's because parents are more interested in their phones than their child.

If it was really down to Covid then issues in schools should start to really reduce now, but do I think that's going to happen? No I don't - and i think it's down to parenting and screens more than anything else although there seem to be many more kids with SEN who struggle to get a place in a more suitable school and end up in mainstream and find it too much.

I look forward to the day that we stop using Covid as an excuse for everything.

Sloupt · 12/04/2026 20:49

BoleynMemories13 · 12/04/2026 18:05

Where have I said it would specify affect only Year 1 children?

It depends how you interpret this thread. If you're looking for theories as to why Year 1 are apparently struggling more than any other year group (you'll see from the replies that this isn't always the case), then no this wouldn't only affect Year 1 children. If you're looking for theories why children in general seem to be struggling to regulate themselves in schools these days (which does seem to be the general consensus and is definitely my own personal experience, as someone who has taught for 16 years now), lifestyles in the 2020s could play a part.

For whatever reason, young children are becoming increasingly more difficult to teach, for a variety of reasons. This thread has evolved from discussing just Year 1, to talking about current struggles in general among the primary age group compared to years gone by. This could be down to many many factors, of which the change in lifestyle when it comes to working parents and family dynamics in general COULD play a part.

I'm trying to put the focus on lifestyle changes, rather than working parents specifically, as I don't for one minute think the issues are simply because more parents are now working full time. You mention the 90s. In the 90s, children 'fending for themselves', as you put it, potentially looked like kids playing out with the rest of the neighborhood kids until the streetlights came on and it was time to go home for dinner, once parents had finished work. These days, the picture for many is more like sitting isolated on a device until dinner time, with 'dinner' often being snacky foods while still sitting in front of a screen. Family meal times are becoming a thing of the past for many.

It's the lifestyle changes that have the much bigger effect, not necessarily the fact parents are busy working. I'm not sure why a few people have really honed in on that and are determined to prove me wrong as I haven't actually said "kids are struggling to behave at school because their parents work full time". It really is not that blaxk and white and, once again, it is merely a theory some people have. It's not my own personal opinion.

Apologies, it was because you quoted the OP who I thought was asking why it specifically affected Y1s. I can see it could be interpreted more generally than that. I've worked in education and am aware of the theory. I don't personally agree as the very same behaviours are seen in children whose parents don't work due to the cost of childcare, younger siblings or unemployment. I've never worked in a school where it's the norm for both parents to have a job but have seen, across different schools, the same issues that are described by teachers in areas with more working parents.

BoleynMemories13 · 12/04/2026 21:32

Sloupt · 12/04/2026 20:49

Apologies, it was because you quoted the OP who I thought was asking why it specifically affected Y1s. I can see it could be interpreted more generally than that. I've worked in education and am aware of the theory. I don't personally agree as the very same behaviours are seen in children whose parents don't work due to the cost of childcare, younger siblings or unemployment. I've never worked in a school where it's the norm for both parents to have a job but have seen, across different schools, the same issues that are described by teachers in areas with more working parents.

I appreciate you trying to see things from a different perspective. Yes, non-working families can bring a whole different set of issues altogether. There really is no definite answer as to why there are currently so many issues among primary aged children. Life in general has changed so much in the last decade and ultimately I think that's what it boils down to. Regardless of whether parents work or not, it's a different world now for do many reasons.

Concernedfriend2023 · 12/04/2026 21:34

All anecdotal, but yes, my DD's Year 1 class is an absolute nightmare, I have to say. Disruptive, poor attainment (thankfully not my daughter, she's managing okay), high levels of quite significant SEN. Her experience of school has been the very different to my DS, who had a pretty ride when if comes to classmates. Same school, teachers etc. There's lots of biting, hitting, whole class punishments to try and control the unruly children. This just wasn't a thing when my DS was in Year 1.

BillyBites · 12/04/2026 21:53

Our local group of head teachers met up
recently and every single one of them (according to my Head) reported that the current year one cohort is the worst/most challenging seen for a long time.

landlordhell · 13/04/2026 16:31

BoleynMemories13 · 12/04/2026 19:40

Yes, this is definitely my experience too in recent years. Of course we don't want young children to fear teachers, but they should fear getting into trouble. They should wish to avoid consequences.

Years back, most children looked to avoid getting into trouble at school and they certainly didn't want their parents to find out about it if they did. These days, most aren't at all bothered about either. The fact so many parents openly make excuses for the behaviour in front of their child, and don't ever bring in consequences at home for getting into trouble at school, really doesn't help. It's like we're fighting a losing battle to have our rules and boundaries respected by children and even parents in some cases.

100%

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread