Dealing with it can be overwhelming at this stage - you've been focussed on getting answers and now you've got them, there's suddenly a new mountain in front of you to start climbing, so just take it steady - one step at a time :-)
- Independent isn't an option financially for us, fees would be a big stretch and on top of that you have to pay for the SEN support additionally, it's not included in the fees.
FWIW we have kept DS in his state primary and just threw some money at supporting outside school. If your DD is happy in her school, and pastoral support is good, that's worth a lot.
You will get no traction with the fact she's not meeting her own academic potential as long as she's meeting ARE... but if the school care about wellbeing, they WILL care about the emotional and mental health impacts of her strengths and weaknesses going unsupported, once these are brought to their attention. So personally I would keep her where she is for now and advocate for the help she needs from the perspective of maintaining self-esteem, engagement with learning and good mental health, which should get traction and is what's important here. (And don't be fobbed off with just ELSA interventions for the symptoms once they emerge, what you want is for the root cause to be addressed.)
I absolutely hear what you're saying about them having lots of kids with more obviously pressing needs and I know I've felt awkward about asking for support for DS, and I've found it almost impossible to advocate for support for the strengths until this year (wish I'd done it sooner). But for our kids, a lot of the support actually costs very little - just "getting" them, and saying the right things at the right time, and some small adjustments in the classroom, are pretty much free and go a very long way. As long as you're in a position to provide the 1:1 tailored support outside school, there's a lot school can do that should be within the art of the possible, without taking money and time away from kids whose needs are more obviously acute.
Independent schools vary in their approach to SpLDs so you could be out of the frying pan into the fire depending where you go...choose carefully! We're keeping it in mind as a backup for secondary and will review at the end of year 7 if it's all going tits up by then, but we're in an area where there's always some movement between state and independent sectors so it might be different in eg London where it's harder to get places.
- It's nuanced and tricky, like you say...
Is there dyslexia in the family? My DH was diagnosed at college so he's been able to support DS which is great as there's someone at home who absolutely gets it. If you can show her people - IRL or stories online from dyslexia advocates - who have got where they want to academically and professionally despite (or because of - DH always says because of) their dyslexia, she might feel more positive.
Keeping trying with spelling is all about pragmatism in this house - acknowledging that yes it is 10x the work for 1/10th the results and some of them never stick in long term memory and yes that's
*** annoying, but it's worth plugging away as it will improve slowly with work and repetition - DH's spelling is still improving at 50 - and the more spellings you know or have an idea of yourself, the more effectively you can use the assistive tech so it's still worth it in today's world.
I tell DS it's like sports if you're not sporty (which neither of us are) - you don't give up on doing some exercise for health and wellbeing, but you have realistic expectations of yourself and don't believe you'll make the Olympic team if only you try hard enough, and you also don't decide it's therefore all pointless.
For explaining dyslexia generally, the Nessy books explaining dyslexia and self-advocacy hit the spot with DS after he was diagnosed. Really important too that she has ways to contribute and have interests and strengths recognised in school and at home that aren't dependent on spelling and times tables recall, too. (Eg DS is a fab verbal communicator so occasionally taking writing out of the equation completely is a morale boost.) School have a big part to play there but it's a cheap and easy win for them, just needs understanding.
- DS's written work went backwards in year 2 into year 3 too. In his case he was self sabotaging because it was easier emotionally to mess it up on purpose or not put much down, than try and deal with the frustration. Diagnosis helped massively along with occasionally having a scribe so he could let rip with his ideas.
If your DD's writing is suffering from over focusing on spelling, her teachers can change that by giving her permission to let herself off that hook (as they'll be the ones who put her on it) - for example, they can encourage her to make her best guess so as not to break the flow, and go back and underline the word she isn't sure about when she finishes the sentence, to review later. Then she can work on that tricky word in a separate session, which takes the spelling away from the creative part of writing - make it about editing, which is just a small part of the whole writing process, and help her believe she's still a "writer" even if she's a wobbly speller. There are some children's authors who are dyslexic so might be worth looking them up.
It might be more than just the spelling though - the working memory difficulties can impact structuring and organising ideas, so she might need some explicit teaching of ways to help her compensate. Writing frames, post it planning, simple mind maps, etc. Her tutor should be able to help on that front, and might be able to guide the school too. This is important for the long term so she has a tool box to draw on as the writing load increases as she moves up through the school and on to secondary. They might not be tools the school automatically think of for year 3, but your DD might need them now so year group norms shouldn't wag the dog.
- I think there are times when handwriting is helpful, so I'm woth you, she needs it in her toolbox for the future. I also think there's an optimum age for touch typing and it's counter productive to push them into it too early. Year 3 is probably too early - maybe more for year 5-ish? When she learns, she needs to learn proper touch typing so she can build up a good speed. I found for DS that a big concerted push in the summer holidays when there's no other demands and pressures and he could practice daily (heavily bribed) was the best way.
But for right now...if she can occasionally dictate into an iPad and that takes the frustration out of writing and allows her to get more of her ideas down, I think that could be really good for her? Practise and familiarity with "ear reading" and how to extract information from audio inputs is also worth starting young, alongside reading - she will need this skill for longer text in later school years and in the world of work. Assistive tech doesn't have to be all or nothing, it's about having everything in her toolbox including handwriting and reading the old fashioned way, and then in the future she can mix and match according to the situation.
I'd really recommend exploring Caroline Bateman's resources on this area.
Hope that helps. Sorry for another long brain dump. Happy to answer any more questions, or if your DD has any herself for DS, that it might help her to hear the experience of a peer who's been through it, I can feed back his answers to you by PM :-)