thCpanniers · Today 09:21
18thCpanniers · Today 09:19
I think you may have missed the issue being raised. I have no issue with honest feedback: I welcome it. I was concerned that my daughter’s behaviour had changed significantly and suddenly. She was formerly confident and was keen to share her ideas in class, and this was commented on by her previous teachers. She then gets a new teacher who is a known shouter (at this stage in the year, her shoutiness has been confirmed, since one cannot help hearing it through the classroom walls in the place designated for us to collect our children).
At the teacher’s first meeting with me, she comments on the reticence of my child to speak in class. My child becomes anxious about making mistakes in her homework or reading, in a way that she was not previously. As it happens, I have been trained in child safeguarding, as have you. Does a sudden and unexplained change in behaviour not ring any warning bells, or warrant at least the most basic of investigations? While other avenues certainly warrant investigation (is she safe in and out of school?) since the changes in behaviour relate to learning, it seems reasonable to discuss the matter with the school first. If you cannot see the importance of investigating sudden changes in behaviour from the most obvious angle, as well as the less obvious ones, then your autumn-term re-training in safeguarding can’t come soon enough.
I am sorry if you have parents of pupils who complain about everything. I know some such parents and have heard the things they say. (“There is no way my Tarquin punched William: the playground staff have blamed Tarquin for everything ever since the urinals were blocked with tissue and the floor flooded, and the TA on duty said that she saw him hiding in the loos and laughing when children stepped on the flooded floor!”) These sorts of absurdities to not mean that teachers are infallible in their behaviour management strategies and that no child every finds a teacher intimidating, lacking in empathy, or simply lacking in appropriate attention and curiousity.
In parent interviews and reports, I do not need to hear that my DD is a ‘delight to teach.’ That’s entirely subjective and one of the most overused and pointless phrases ever to grace a report. I am less interested in the personal preferences of my child’s teacher with regards to individual children (“Oh, I like this one, she’s so cute, and she always says thank you” or whatever)I want to know whether she is more or less confident in speaking in class, whether she is making progress in various subjects, whether her behaviour in class is conducive to her own learning and that of others, whether she follows the ules and is courteous and kind to others, whether she is confident enough to try new things (for how else would she learn?) and what the teacher thinks I should do, if anything, to help her to learn at home.
I would rather receive a grades-only report and a brief comment or grade on a list of expected behaviours and school values than read a load of carefully-phrased ‘read-between-the-lines’ claptrap. Standardised scores might be if given some context and analysis (some exams come with automated responses explaining strengths and weaknesses) as it would be good to know whether my child is below average, average, or above average, and how consistent their performance is over time. Simple, largely numerical reports with a few succinct words about learning behaviour, general school behaviour (respect for rules, social behaviour, whether my child is inclined to dominate or bully) would save you time, and they would be more useful to parents, since it is not ‘being a delight to teach’ does not help parents to plan for suitable secondary school applications. Please do tell your headmistress/headmaster/school governor, or whoever is responsible for deciding what is and is not included. Once parents get used to reading clear facts and numbers, they will get over the need for endless subjective praise, or seek it from more appropriate place (grandparents, doting aunts) rather than professionals. They may need some explanation about how standardised scores work (when they do work): they should not necessarily be expected to rise with each exam each year unless the child is underperforming to begin with.
Your response sounds unnecessarily aggressive, and it is interesting that you interpreted the teacher’s information as criticism rather than merely feedback about my child’s behaviour in class. I consider it as a description of a behaviour, nothing more, and the reason I was concerned is because the behaviour described represented a sudden change.
In spite of your aggressive response, I will be charitable and assume that it is because you are exhausted, overworked, in the middle of doing countless unnecessary tasks at the behest of some ambitious member of your leadership team as well as writing nonsensical phrases in reports, and you are probably frustrated with the government’s refusal to guarantee teachers a pay and retirement package that is commensurate with the duties and accountability the job requires. I don’t know whether you are striking, but if you are, I would support, rather than blame, you. Why should anyone be guilted into doing something for nothing (or an ever-diminishing rewarded)?
I wish you a restful summer break and hope that you return relaxed and less angry than you sound right now.