[quote HallieKnight]@InFlagranteDerelicto letting your child direct their own learning is very successful. Forcing them through pointless work with only make them disengage with learning[/quote]
Speaking as someone who was in a similar position to the OP's child (I could read independently by 3, I just picked it up naturally) I have to say that I was incredibly bored at school. This did not engender a love of learning - in fact, rather the opposite.
I know reception is not exactly pedal to the metal time but I want him to get into the habit of having to try a bit, so he doesn't get a horrible shock somewhere down the line.
This is exactly what happened to me. Told all my childhood I was a genius, mediocre A-levels because I didn't do any revision. Consequently I didn't get into my first choice of university.
OP - I'd just carry on with the reading. Anything & everything he's interested in. Not just modern stuff, either - older books tend to use different vocabulary & sentence structure, which will expand his range of experience. But also yes to other things, anything he can benefit from, & enjoy.
The brightest ones certainly do remember words but you cannot assume they don't understand either. The brightest just do.
I was reading James Herriot by 7, & remember figuring out what an embryotomy wire was. It was pretty obvious from the description. Not that I'm suggesting the OP gives James Herriot to her reception aged child, probably a bit much. 