Baby is nearly 1 so school is a long way off, but we want to buy here (relocated from north to south last year) now and won't want to move again before he starts school.
There is a house we could juuuust about afford (if we scrape everything together) right next to an ofsted outstanding state primary. The house needs work which we could afford to do eventually, but we could probably only afford to make it liveable before moving in.
Alternatively we have seen a few nice houses near "good" (ofsted) schools which are more comfortably within budget.
The house in question is much bigger, and has more potential than the others too, and it has other positives such as being v close to DP's office and also baby's nursery. So it wouldn't be a total loss, but the main reason I want to stretch to buy it is because of the school. Is this crazy?
DP seems to think that everything will have changed by the time baby is at school (he even said today that state schools might not even be around by then...) so there is no point buying a house based on it. I don't think this is likely, but I suppose the school could really go downhill?