Hm. Sorry to distract but I am also wondering if I should mention an error.
Received DS Y2 report today, consisting of a) a sheet giving SATS test results, and end-of-key-stage-1 teacher assessments; and b) the 'usual' (for our school) end of year report that gives fairly extensive and detailed comments, and effort/attainment grading for a whole range of subjects, and the school internal progress/attainment grading results for reading, writing and Maths.
Now the end-of-key-stage-1 teacher assessment, being very brief and just numbers and grades, shows that DS is 'working at the expected standard' for writing.
However the school internal report includes the phrase 'brilliotic-DS is working at greater depth within the expected standard in Writing because he is able to ...' and the examples that follow are AFAIK the kind of things required for achieving GDS.
So I am unsure which one is right and which one is a typo/copy-paste error. I suspect the EXS on the KS1-assessment sheet is correct and the GDS in the text was copy-pasted from another child by mistake, but I can't be sure.
At the most recent parents' evening in March the teacher said she hoped she could get DS to GDS level in Writing but he wasn't quite there yet, so I am curious as to which one it is!
Would that be worth inquiring about? Pointing out the error - either way, one of the two reports is incorrect. I am unsure because we (DS and I) liked the teacher, and the teacher is leaving the school. In some way I feel it doesn't really matter but in another way, if they are going to assess such young children against a national framework, I would kind of like to know the result!