DD (8) is a "lively" character, has some issues with concentration (currently been assessed for possible ADHD or similar), but has always been described as "not naughty, just a lively child" by her teachers, this being reflected in the lack of punishments or me being called to discuss any sort of bad behaviour.
Last week DD mentioned to me that she had been sitting on her own at lunchtime as a punishment for stealing a friend's crisps. I wasn't particularly happy with this (especially considering both her and the friend in question say she didn't do this - apparently the evidence was based on her having one of the aforementioned crisps in her hand...given to her by said friend) and told DD that I would go in to have a word, she said "don't worry mum, I don't want to make it even bigger". So I left it.
Today DD said that she was still on a table on her own and was being told that she wasn't allowed to look at anyone. She's now getting pretty upset about it and asking why she's being punished so much when she didn't even do it.
I am not a fan of isolation as a punishment in general, unless other forms of punishment have been exhausted (and not deterred the child), or to protect the safety/wellbeing of the other pupils, and especially not for the length of time it has been going on for.
Even of she "did the crime" then I really feel that the punishment is very excessive - apparently she has to earn their trust back before they will let her return to her friends.
I'm thinking maybe there is more to the story and things are more serious - to the extent that it warranted such a punishment? But if so, then surely this would have warranted a call to me to discuss her behaviour?
I've got no experience in the area of school punishments/discipline - dd being an only child and having not been given a punishment to date (that I'm aware of anyway!).
Am I being all special snowflakey about this (I am pretty damn angry) or do you think my feelings are justified?
N.B: I'm planning on speaking to them tomorrow morning.