Got collared by DD's teacher this morning who said that DD and a couple of others in her class who were the best at maths had done a level 3 paper but all were still 2A and this was what she was expecting as there was stuff on the paper they hadn't been taught. She suggested giving me DD's paper so I can see what she cannot do and potentially fill in some gaps myself if I want to.
This is all on the teacher's own initiative. I have only spoken to DD's teacher about maths twice all year, as follows:
(1) At parent teacher meeting in Autumn I was told she should get 2B at the end of the year but might get 2A if things went really well and I said I would like to think it was possible she could get to level 3.
(2) Earlier this year I became aware that the teacher was discussing maths paper results with other parents so asked for DD's and was told "2B which is exactly where she should be" and I was perfectly happy with this.
Frankly I'm a bit baffled how the above two interactions could have marked me out as some kind of tiger mother who is going to be so brassed off if my daughter doesn't get level 3 that I'm willing to coach her myself. This leaves me wondering if teacher herself thinks DD should be level 3 but is not able to teach her to that level in class.
WWYD? Does getting a level 3 matter? Is it unusual for there to be no child working at level 3 in a Y2 class of 30? (school is ofsted RI on a council estate but we love it very very much)
Thanks in anticipation. I am going to post and run to the shops but will check back later.