DD's report stated 1B writing 1A reading and 1A Maths and 37 phonics. We are all very happy with it as the detail shows that she has really enjoyed her learning this year. but I queried the level for Maths with her teacher as during the year teacher has always said she is very strong in Maths and contributes well during those particular lessons!!.
Also her school Maths work book said 2C on the work sheets since April (which is when I noticed) - and the goals on the report for when she starts year 2 relate to the 2A level descriptors.
I mentioned this to teacher and he said - "Oh yes - she is now actually 1A writing 1A reading and 2C for Maths - as the reports were based on May half term assessment?? 
Whilst I understand the practicalities for this -
If levels are going to be reported (and I understand it is only a requirement at yr2 and 6) shouldn't this be made clearer to parents that the levels relate to the previous term, as they are after all "end of year reports".
I am only aware of this because I asked but many parents wouldn't and would be left to think their child is not showing that they understand aspects of the curriculmn being taught in school and may then be going over work in the summer that they think their child needs more help with (yes I am talking about myself
)
The cynic in me feels that they under rate to show a bigger improvement by the end of yr 2. Am I jumping to conclusions? - if so that's not the intention but I do have a keen interest in my daughter's education and try to work alongside the school.
However if they are giving incorrect information - it doesn't help.