Thanks everyone.
teacherwith2kids repeating a year is not the case for me. And the funding is based on the number of years education and not when it is taken
According to the leaflet at
www.gov.uk/government/publications/summer-born-children-school-admission
Q11. If a child is educated out of their normal age group, will their primary school lose funding once they reach age 11?
A11. Primary schools are funded for the number of pupils they have on roll, regardless of their age, though local authorities may choose to weight that funding according to age. Similarly, secondary schools are funded on the basis of the number of pupils they have in years 7-11, regardless of their age, which again may be weighted according to age by local authorities.
prh47bridge I think it is very strange that any school would wish to disadvantage a child to ensure they take exams, which presumably they do very badly at if they had missed a year of education in!
From the same leaflet it says...
Q12. If a child is educated out of their normal age group, when will they finish school?
A12. A child ceases to be of compulsory school age on the last Friday of June in the school year they become 16. If a child is educated outside of their normal age group (i.e. is in year 10 when this date is reached) the school will continue to receive funding for that child but the child will no longer be of compulsory school age during the school year in which most children take their GCSE examinations.
The government is changing the law so that all young people will be required to continue in education or training until the end of the academic year in which they turn 17 in 2013 and until their 18th birthday in 2015. Young people will have a choice about how they do this. It could be through full time education in school or college, an apprenticeship or full time employment combined with part time education. The school leaving age will remain unchanged.
So if the school continues to receive the funding then why would they mind? Presumably any parent who was concerned for their child's education enough to 'fight' the system to get them into a deferred year would also want them to take the exams.
This is all new to me but it is making me very suspicions of what agenda the schools actually have! I mean is it the benefit of the children or ticking boxes! No offence to any teachers who do a fabulous and very difficult job!