My eldest is at a small, non-selective prep school. He's been there since nursery, and I have always been very happy with it. My youngest is at the nursery there, and will be reception in September. My question is two fold. Firstly, DP has decided (and I don't fully understand why, despite much discussion...) that he is against private education full stop. He is therefore pushing very hard to take eldest out, and for youngest to go to a local state primary. I think the main factor for him is money (it is an expense, which means we go without other things, but affordable). To complicate this, I am actually a teacher myself, in a good state secondary. I am well aware that state schools can provide an excellent standard of education, but I can also see through the blarney in Ofsted reports, and worry that teachers spend far too much time sorting out the minority at the expense of the majority. My son is above average academically (but by no means a genius), but sport mad, so benefits enormously from the extra curricular parts. My youngest is more complicated, and I think could easily be labelled as difficult or SEN in a class of 30, whereas they know and understand him where he is (an will be in a class of 16).
I am very happy with where they are. In the future, secondary private is possibly/likely to be beyond our budget (we're not in a selective area either). This is causing enormous disharmony with DP. So secondly, should I give in, and take the boys out of a school I and they love? Or is DP right, and actually, the good state primary just down the road will be just fine? I know every school is different, but if anyone has any experience of a similar choice I would appreciate your thoughts. I'm not ideologically wedded to either - I just want what is best for my children.