I've posted before asking how quickly sounds are being taught for other schools, and definitely think our school is slow. DS has spent a whole week on one letter, and has only learned 17 sounds since September, whereas his friends at other schools have at least learned all 26 alphabet letters and their sounds, often plus some 2-letter sounds. He is given the same book for up to a fortnight, which appear to be old look and say books. When I've raised this, I've been told it's the pattern of the story that's important, but I don't get the point if he cannot decode, and therefore read it? We read plenty of books at home, surely the point of a reader is that he can read it? At home, he can decode, with expression, books with blue bands from phonics schemes. All the pupils are learning sounds at the same rate, regardless of past knowledge, there is no 'setting'.
All of this, I was gritting my teeth and letting slide... until I looked at the Ofsted dashboard today, and the school is in the bottom quartile for key stage 1. So, not only am I surprised as a parent at their methods, or lack of them, they appear to fail the tests, too.
So, now I'm really worried. My DS is averagely bright (I'd like to think above average, but he can take a while to 'get' things, so about average I would expect), and I am anxious to support him. However, I am sending him to school to learn, and if this is going to be of life defining importance, I will send him privately. He loves his school, so this is big. He is exhausted at the end of school, so teaching him myself may wear him out, as it will be more work at the end of a school day, when tired.
There are no vacancies for school governors. I don't want to be 'that' parent, but there are a few of us now who are concerned. The teacher herself is wonderful, but I think overstretched (they've had to take more pupils than there were space for originally, and it's a mixed class with year ones.)
Sorry, this is long, but I'm feeling really concerned, and wondering what to do?