DD2 is in reception. She doesn't recognise letters apart from those in her name plus P and S in phonics only. School were aware of this when she started. She has short term memory issues and it takes alot of repetition to get her to this level.
She has had difficulties in understanding that a letter has a sound, a name and an action.
Is it better to take longer learning sound, name and action or continue teaching phonic sounds only? She is unlikely to learn the action and names afterwards as she is rigid in what she knows.
In a meeting yesterday, school insisted the whole would/should be taught and she is best knowing a handful properly than all in phonics only. I feel it will severely limit her in her learning to do this and while not ideal she would be able to get by and continue to learn using phonics until hopefully she gains the names as she grows up.
I have another meeting on Friday with the HT who happens to be the SENCO to try to reach an agreement. So I'm just trying to understand their opinion as,to me, it seems bizarre.