they tried several times to hijack the application to another council
This comment plus the fact you say you applied for 8 schools suggests you applied to both Barnet and Haringey. Barnet cannot accept your application as you don't live there. They would therefore have referred your application back to Haringey. You can apply for schools in Barnet but you do so by naming them as preferences when you apply to Haringey. So Haringey haven't "tried to hijack" your application to Barnet. They have followed the process correctly.
I'm going to contact legal advisors
You are entitled to do so but I would strongly recommend saving your money. Most lawyers know little or nothing about school admissions. I know of many cases where solicitors representing parents have managed to upset the appeal panel by inappropriate behaviour. And even if you win you won't get your money back - costs are not awarded in admission appeals.
Do you think I have a case for appeal
I'm afraid not. Taking your points in order:
- I cannot see any negligence
- Things do change quickly in admissions sometimes. The fact you were told you would have to wait and later the same day they sent you an offer does not mean anyone lied. Even if they did you cannot win an appeal on that basis
- I see no evidence that any rules have been overlooked
- Given that your application was just before the start of the summer holidays I am not surprised it has taken a while to sort out a place for you. In any case you cannot win an appeal on the basis of delays by the LA unless the delay was unreasonable and cost you a place at your preferred school. An unreasonable delay on its own won't be enough to win a case
- They were absolutely correct to treat you as an in year application, the same as someone who is unhappy with their current school. That is the way the system works
- Whilst you consider 6 miles to be unreasonable an appeal panel probably wouldn't. A journey of up to one hour each way is normally regarded as acceptable
The published statistics on admission distances to which you refer only covers the initial round. There may be other children admitted in year travelling as far as, or even further than, your child. In any event, I suspect you will find that the only way your child can be admitted to one of your preferred schools would be to break the law on infant class sizes. If that is the case the LA cannot compromise with you. It has no choice. And if they were going to compromise they would have done so already.
It is likely that any appeal will be an infant class size case. That means you can only win if:
- the admission arrangements did not comply with the law or the Admissions Code and the non-compliance cost your child a place. On the information you have posted Haringey appear to have complied fully with the law and the Code.
- the arrangements were not applied correctly and impartially, and this cost your child a place. As this is an in year admission it is very unlikely you would win on this basis. On the information you have posted Haringey appear to have applied their admission arrangements correctly.
- the decision to refuse admission was unreasonable. The standard for a decision to be unreasonable is very high. I know you consider Haringey's decision to be unreasonable but I would be very surprised if an appeal panel agreed.
You are, of course, entitled to appeal and you may strike it lucky. But on the information you have posted I would regard an appeal as a very long shot.