Hello,
my daughter is in P3 (Scotland), equivalent to Y2 in England. She is in the middle group for Maths, but I think that at school she should be encouraged to work harder. I talked to the teacher at the beginning of the year, but the teacher thinks my DD is not confident enough, etc etc (to me this means that the teacher thinks my daughter is not as clever as the kids in the top group, so she shouldn't be pushed to that level).
Anyway, I made her (DD) do a couple of KS1 level 3 Maths tests (we used to live in England, where DD did reception, then moved to Scotland at the beginning of Year 1 / P2). I marked the paper and DD would have been able to reach Level 3, according to the mark scheme. How come she is middle ability in Scotland, but would be in the top 20 % in England?
How can she (or rather I) show the teacher that she can do more than what the teacher thinks? It's true that my DD doesn't seem to care if she's in the middle or top group (I guess she accepts that she's good enough only for the middle group), gets things wrong because she doesn't read the question carefully and misreads numbers (like reading "2 hours" instead of 2 hours and a half), but this doesn't mean that more shouldn't be expected from her, as she clearly shows that she can do more, when I expect her to do better.
Doesn't ability grouping put a ceiling on children?
I'll be very happy to read any of your comments. Thanks.