My daughter was on school dinners last term but asked to change to packed lunches because she found them 'disgusting.' The only food she liked were the afters, and particularly chocolate sponge and custard.
I've been sending her in with sandwiches, a piece of fruit and some yogurt. She's much happier now.
However, last week the teacher confiscated her (100 per cent organic orange) juice because, it turns out, it is the only food, apart from chocolate, which is banned from lunch boxes.
Why?
They are allowed Smoothie (also high sugar content). They are allowed fairy cakes. They are allowed flap-jacks and crisps. They are allowed biscuits. They are allowed sickly sweet high sugar content yogurts.
The poster in the school entrance hall advertising five a day healthy eating has a tick next to a glass of juice and a big cross next to cakes and sweets.
My daughter asked me why she's not allowed juice (when it's on the poster) and why she's not allowed chocolate (when the school dinners are serving it up).
I've explained that grown ups and institutions are not infallable and sometimes make silly rules. I've said we sometimes have to follow the rules even though they don't make much sense (and because, in this instance, it doesn't matter). Which I suppose is a useful lesson to learn early on in life.
But should I bother to challenge the school - on the grounds that rules should at least be a) logical and b) reinforce the nutrition advice they purport to teach. Or can someone out there explain to me an inner logical I cannot currently see.