This is going to be very hard to explain without offending anyone, but I'll have a go.
My children attend a school which:
- traditionally attracts a high proportion of families from a part of town with a high level of social deprivation;
- has a high proportion of children with SEN - partly because it has a specialist learning;
- support unit, and partly because we have all the usual issues associated with areas of social deprivation;
- has a handful of children from the traveller site on the edge of town;
- is generally avoided by people from the posh side of town, a high proportion of whome opt to go private, while most of the rest ship their children out to schools in neighbouring villages.
The school has a history of below average attainment, partly because of the SEN provision, partly because of the nature of the catchment area, and, frankly, because it needed shaking up a bit. However, it has reached a point where all children are demonstrably progressing well and SATs results are improving every year. We also have a new building, lovely facilities, motivated staff, lots of extra-curricular opportunities and a caring, inclusive atmosphere.
Ofsted still says "satisfactory", but if you read the report, it is clear that it would have been "good" if one or two things had been addressed. Those have now been tackled.
Governors are asking for parents' response to the question: how can we now "promote" the school as a great choice for everyone in the town. How can we persuade those who are avoiding their local school out of something that feels a bit like snobbery, but is probably much more complicated than that.
I wonder whether anyone has experience of a school that has been in a similar position, but managed to become much more socially mixed. It just seems daft that so many people are driving so many miles, when there is a great school on their doorstep!