DD (8yo, Y3) has dreadful handwriting but the content of her work is excellent and she's way above average in that. Her teacher is concerned that her handwriting doesn't match the level of her literacy skills - but they are 2 vastly different skills, surely?! Why do they have to be at the same level? The teacher said "I just don't know what to do about her handwriting" - but she's the (very experienced) teacher, shouldn't it be her job to know what to do or am I expecting too much there? DD hasn't got great coordination, she's not very good at art, both me and DH both had dreadful handwriting as school - tbh I'd be surprised if she did have good handwriting skills! I was also bothered by the fact that the teacher said she looked at some of DDs work and, because the writing was so bad, she expected it to be a poor piece of work but she was then very surprised when the content turned out to be excellent. I don't feel this should have been a surprise either - DD has always excelled in literacy and her teacher should know that she's good at it, so why the surprise? She also had DD placed in the top maths group for ages before realising that she struggles with maths and moved her down a group, which also irritates me. But that's another issue :)
It just seems to me that (a) the teacher should know her class's abilities a bit better and (b) she's placing too much emphasis on handwriting. Of course handwriting is important but they're only 8 - surely they'll get better given time?
Would you be concerned about this? (either about the teacher's attitude or about the bad handwriting!) Do I need to do anything or just ignore it?