Marchpane, I was trying to contextualise the teacher's behaviour by describing him - and diffusing my anger by 'putting him down' a bit. I shouldn't be disrespectful, I know. I'm just feeling very angry and protective towards my little boy.
Well, since all the above posts, I've now been in email contact with the teacher, who in fact contacted me late last night, which I appreciated and told him so.
As with previous incidents - some of which don't involve my own child (like the Maths homework for the top set) - he HAS distorted the truth and I'm afraid that I still DO therefore see him as an overgrown schoolboy himself, trying to wriggle out of trouble. This isn't helped by his awful grammatical mistakes throughout his emails.
However, Singledadio, there WAS more going on than DS1 told me and, as I haven't gone in 'all guns blazing' but merely asked for clarification from the teacher, then channels of communication are now opened.
The facts are that DS1 had been noisy earlier in the cloakroom and got into trouble with another teacher for this and got a 'minus' point from that other teacher. So he came into the fun quiz class unsettled and upset.
According to the teacher, he (the teacher) didn't want DS1 to get another minus point so when he wouldn't settle, put him out in the corridor with a book. Now, according to DS1, DS1 was standing for the whole time and according to the teacher, DS1 was sitting (though the only place to sit there is a narrow windowsill). According to DS1, the teacher couldn't possibly have seen him whilst he was out, as the classroom door frame prevents this - and this I also know to be true as I know the locality and you can't see out of the classroom unless you walk right up to the small glasss part on the side of the door furthest from the teacher's desk.
The teacher clearly wants me to think that DS1 was at all times observed - therefore supervised - but this isn't likely to be true as the teacher would have been sitting at his desk, with his back to the door and glass, supervising a quiz for 25 other children.
The length of time out differs too. The teacher claims it was only 40 minutes and DS1 claims it was the whole of the double Games period - 1 hr and 20 mins. I assume it was probably somewhere between these two times, as it was clearly across the 1 hr 20 min block of time for that double period.
The teacher has admitted forgetting about DS1 on a different occasion, when he'd told DS1 to see him at lunch break but again the story differs as DS1 told me he was alone in the classroom all lunch break and the teacher tells me that he could only have been there 15 mins.
Other witnesses to the current incident indicate that DS1 was sent out for just about the whole of 1hr and 20 mins and was standing and not reading, throughout that time, at least when he was seen. However, as these other witnesses are children and you could argue are less than reliable, then again I assume that part of what DS1 says is the truth and part of what the teacher says is the truth.
If this were an experienced teacher, where there was no other history of 'distorting the truth', forgetting children, overreacting to behaviour, then I might be more inclicned to give him the benefit of the doubt. But the context of my concerns are within a background of other parents and children having problems with the teacher.
It would be more clear cut if my child were absolutely immaculately behaved but as DS1 is sometimes trying to be the class joker (this is partly for bravado and partly because he feels he doesn't have friends this yr), then I have to accept that part of what the teacher says must be true.
On the other hand, it has indeed been regarding other perfectly behaved children that the teacher seems to 'distort the truth of what happened', despite other witnesses reporting to the contrary and also to over react to 'misbehaviour' eg when children take more than 5 mins to change for Games.
So I feel I really need to keep an eye on both my son and the teacher. I've asked the teacher to keep me up to date with things and I'll see how things transpire. I think senior staff must be aware by now that several parents are less than happy with the teacher.
Marchpane, I've held back my more emotional reaction with the teacher and put it all out on MN instead. With the teacher directly, I've bene very respectful and open to his interpretation and am reflecting on how to proceed from here. Of course I know my son best and I understand the context in which he's been playing the joker at school (whole other thread on the Gifted & Talented but Failing at School on MN) and so I can see the full background which makes me know that this isn't about a little boy being badly behaved. I think it's about an inexperienced teacher coming up against his own fear of losing control with pupils and sometimes making mistakes.