I am a SAHM and sort of in two minds about sending my eldest to nursery once he turns 3 and I get 15 free hours. I kind of want to homeschool once he's 5 but I think it is hard for very young children to socialise without being pushed into it so I can see the benefits.
Thing is, up until then I absolutely can't afford it either way so I am wondering if I ought to be trying to teach things in the curriculum to my son or else he will end up way behind other children who mostly do go to nursery and be at a disadvantage from the outset. When he was one I was absolutely sure he was THE MOST advanced baby in the world, incredibly clever and would always be, but as he gets older I become aware of his weaker areas (mark making, pretend play - he does it but it's very limited and stilted, confidence in conversation with unfamiliar people, peer interaction) although he still has strengths (very good verbal skills, great with numbers, lots of pre-literacy skills, lots of general knowledge stuff - shapes, colours, birds, animals, trees, flowers etc, very good memory for books and songs).
His social and communication and fine motor are the things I feel he needs most encouragement in. Thing is I am a pretty divided person at the best of times - the type A side of me wants to prepare games and activities to work with him to improve his weak spots and then the type B side of me feels like, he's not even 2 yet (for another 2 weeks), he will probably come into his own in time, people in most times in history didn't make desperate efforts to coach their kids into fitting into some developmental framework and for the most part they still grew up to become competent adults etc etc.
So yeah...