I totally agree with this
"This isn??t an education policy, it??s an employment policy supporting families, and therefore it??s not going to reach all children because both parents have to be in employment to be eligible for the 30 hours,??
No 3 yr old needs 30 hours of education a week.
This is wrong / said in ignorance though:
The impact of the new policy ?? a key Conservative party election pledge in the general election ?? could affect many of the 300,000 three- and four-year-olds who attend nursery classes in state schools in England, and push a significant proportion into more expensive private childcare
I can't speak for other areas of the country, but the vast majority of EEE places in our Local Authority are already "bought" in PVIs (Private, Independent, and Voluntary Nurseries), not in schools. There are not enough spaces for all the dc entitled to funded places at present (3yr and 2 yr funding), so there isn't anywhere to "push" the children to even if it were somehow a 2nd class system.
Don't even get me started on the lack of funding to support children with additional needs - it's no good providing a 'place' for a child with complex needs, if you are then refusing to offer any further support in terms of additional staffing, or enough advice, training, and support from professionals in the authority.