We've just moved to California where the rules used to be children turning 5 by 1st December would start that September. Which DS (birthday end of October) would do, which although would mean being young in his year here would mean starting the same year he would have done at home in UK. We're intending to go home after 3/4 years.
California have just changed the rules so that children have to have turned 5 by September 1st. Which means he'll be nearly 6 when actually starts and a year behind when we get home.
A) I don't know if this actually puts him at an advantage?
B) I don't know if it's even worth trying to convince pre-school and then kindergarten to take him a year early for these reasons
What do you think? He's average intelligence as far as I can see (he's currently 3), but in my head starting a year later would mean he'd always stay a year behind, which is rubbish because he's old in the school year anyway (if he was a summer baby I wouldn't bother making a fuss) and of course an extra year paying for extortionate daycare!
WWYD?