For me the desire to have a VBAC had a practical and an emotional aspect.
Practically, I had a 22-month-old at home and no close family etc. living close by, so I was keen to get home as quickly as possible and to be able to lift my dd1, drive, etc.
Emotionally, I had a slightly 'unreal' experience with dd1. Was hospitalised from 27 weeks and had an elective section at 36 weeks. Had no experience of labour at all. Also had some difficulties after the birth as dd1 was small and had feeding difficulties (not caused by the c-section, but all added to the unreal experience, iykwim). I definitely do not think that a c-section is some kind of second-class experience. Actually mine was fab. It was more everything that came with it (in my case, which is obviously not the same for everyone) - the 10 weeks in hospital, having to go home without my dd, not being able to breastfeed, not being able to go to Mothercare and buy the stuff we needed for her, not being at home to decorate her bedroom, that kind of thing. I just wanted a more 'normal' experience the 2nd time round. I'd have been happy to have another section if I'd gone overdue. But I'd have been able to plan for that if it had happened. It was the having everything taken out of my hands that I objected to.
Btw, one factor for me was that my reason for having the section first time round was a 'non-repeating' thing (placenta praevia).
Good luck, whatever kind of birth you decide to go for. Remember it's the end result that counts. Oh and (just scrolling through other replies before hitting 'post') whichever way your child arrives it is a 'real' birth, you are a 'real' mother. I have had both experiences and they are jointly the best experiences of my life. I would never rate one above the other, although a VBAC was right for me, 2nd time around.