'Emotive responses such as ?you can't cure a stillbirth with amoxicillin? are unhelpful because they detract from the real issue - your family's personal experience with the bacteria notwithstanding'
But Killerkitty as this thread shows all our opinions are based on and formed by, to a greater or lesser degree 'personal experience'; your run-in with your teenage minimum wage earner in Canary Wharf (ignorant comments can come from any sector of the earrning spectrum, by the way), has formed your very strong opinion.
In all of my pregnancies, I have never ever once been challenged by a stranger, friend or family member about alcohol, caffeine or foodstuffs. I have chosen to avoid certain foods (including bagged salads, goats cheese) because I am simply too nervous. The risk of stillbirth due to any cause is relatively low (1 in 1,000), but if you become that one, and you find out what the cause is, the reality of these very powerful, deadly bacteria suddenly becomes an unwelcome part of your reality.
I was once a very blase pregnant woman who thought the whole food thing was ridiculous.
'Half the bloody world is starving and millions of mums-to-be are just grateful for a glass of clean tap water'. My caution is not born out of being fussy or middle class; I consider myself fortunate to be part of an age and a nation where the rates of stillbirth are lower (though have not actually dropped in many years) than elsewhere and than time gone by because we are aware that bacteria and viruses are a major cause of infant mortality, in utero and in the vunerable months after birth.
People always get flamed for 'personlising' this emotive issue but as I began, and as the Canary Wharf example illustrates, BOTH sides of the fence are informed by their own experiences. If I accept your choice to eat whatever you want without getting so clearly irritate, can't you accept mine not to also?