First, am sorry this is so long. Second, if, by any chance, my 2 RL MN friends happen across this, please keep it to yourselves and don't tell anyone else we know because thsu far, I haven't told anyone).
Bit of background:
..... found out I was pregnant a week ago on 30 Aug (I am almost 44 OMG !). My LMP started (I think) on the 26 July, so am guessing that conception would have been around 12, 13, 14 Aug.
Anyway, I developed terrible cystitis at the end of that week, with blood in my urine and then it moved into my kidneys. I eventually went to the doctors on Tues 21 Aug and saw the nurse practitioner, who prescribed me something (this then has to be signed by an actual GP).
Well, you can probably guess what I am going to say can't you. Once I found I was pregnant, I looked up the drug I'd taken and it was Trimethroprim, which isn't recommended during the 1st trimester as it can block the effects of folic acid, which, in turn, leads to a theoretical, greater risk of spina bifida, cleft palate and various other things I can't remember right now.
The thing is, when I saw the nurse, I didn't know I was pregnant, though had I been asked, I would have replied that it was possible as we had been trying (only for a couple of months, so am a bit shocked to have fallen so quickly).
In my past experience - and surely this must be recommended practice ? - when I have been to the doctor, as a woman of child bearing age - with various complaints, I have always been asked previously if there's a possibility of me being pregnant before being given any drug which has contra-indications for pregnancy. Always. It therefore didn't occur to me to announce that I was trying, because I imagined the responsibility of safely prescribing any drug to a patient falls upon the person prescribing it - by way of asking pertinent questions, as necessary. Is that ridiculously naiive ???
I am now in a complete state. I did actually phone the practice once I realised what had happened and my GP spoke to me at length ( I am actually seeing him tomorrow). He confirmed that what I found out was correct but after a lot of umming and aahing and phoning some consultant pharmacologist (or somesuch) he advised that the risk to the fetus is a theoretical one and that the occurence of SB etc in babies whose mums have taken Trimethoprim is no greater than mums who haven't taken it. Yet if that is so, why do they "prefer" (apparently) not to use it in the 1st trimester ?
There's a lot of stuff about it on the net but I have stopped looking now as I was getting no real answers from it and I know that the ONLY answer to my worries is a thorough diagnostic scan at around 20 weeks. However, having been exposed to this risk (theoretical or not) I have now got to worry for the next almost 4 months, in addition to the concerns of a nuchal scan which I was going to have to have anyway (I know I don't have to have it, but I want it).
I feel very strongly that the nurse has been negligent in her duties. Maybe she assumed that because of my age I was unlikely to be pregnant, but if so, that is one hell of an assumption to make when prescribing a potentially dangerous drug. I don't look 60 or anything - hopefully I look younger than I am. I'm thinking it was more likely that she simply didn't remember to check the various contra-indications and ask the right questions. If that is the case, then I am concerned she might not be asking the right questions and/or reading drug info thoroughly when prescribing to other women of child bearing age (or, of course, anyone at all who might be diabetic, smoke, or 1001 other reasons why they shouldn't have a particular drug).
OTOH, I am also aware that I've had a bit of a shock, am worried and upset, and I am questionning - stupidly ?? - if I am right to be complaining at all ? But then I come back to the prospect of a very traumatic late abortion if the worst comes to the worst, which could have been prevented with one simple question. (I know that it is entirely possible to be facing similar dilemmas without ever having taken this particular drug, but if it turns out my baby is damaged in any way, I'll be unable to forget I've taken it and would always wonder how things would have been if I hadn't).
Like I said I see the doctor tomorrow. I am also worrying now about the process of making a complaint - whether I'd have to see and/or speak to this nurse again as part of the complaint, and whether or not my name would consequently be mud at the surgery where I'll be receiving my antenatal care.
Can someone please advise ? I am tying myself up in knots about this - but if I'm going to make an official complaint it really has to be done sooner than later, if only to prevent the same thing happening to someone else.