With my last pregnancy I had a c-section because of a lot of metal in my pelvis, my GP at the time and consultant thought it was too risky to me and the baby to have a vaginal delivery.
Sorry, this exchange is a bit subtle and complicated, I hope I get it right.
I met with my new consultant in a different hospital, and he said he'd like to contact my previous consultant and the surgeon who operated on my pelvis to see if this was true. Then he said, but if you're not set on a vaginal delivery, I don't have to do that because it would be a waste of my time. And I said I wasn't set on vaginal delivery. But then he changed tack and started saying, 'If you really want to have a c-section, I will do one, but you have to understand the risks, are you sure you want one?' and 'I can't make you have a natural birth' And it sort of ended up with me saying three times that I wanted a c-section, when it started out with me telling him that I had to have one, and that I wasn't so set on a vaginal birth that he'd have to research the reasons I couldn't have one.
Basically, he seemed to be making me say, 'I choose this, I am aware of the risks' three times. Then he tried to write in my notes a name for my surgery which was completely unrepresentive of the surgery I had - something totally different and minor, even though I'd explained it in some detail.
When I had the c-section first time around the consultant said the pelvis had made it a tricky delivery. I'm worried now that I'm marked down as a too-posh-to-push and he will not be expecting the complication and something will go wrong.
What happens when you don't like your consultant? Am I over-worrying, and should I just have told him to go ahead and contact everyone? The reason I responded the way I did initially was that he'd said it would be a waste of his time if I wanted a c-s anyway.