Are your children’s vaccines up to date?

Set a reminder

Please or to access all these features

Pregnancy

Talk about every stage of pregnancy, from early symptoms to preparing for birth.

??geriatric pregnancy

146 replies

Nel45 · 04/04/2025 03:55

So I’ve worked in maternity care across the country for nearly 30 years and never once have I come across the term ‘geriatric pregnancy’ being used in the NHS, Nor with my last 3 children born when I was 35-44. (Naturally conceived and born last year)
However just seen a BBC article referring to a mother who had a ‘geriatric pregnancy’ since when did this become an official term in the UK??

OP posts:
Are your children’s vaccines up to date?
Azureshores · 04/04/2025 06:48

I'm pretty sure I was referred to as a geriatric pregnancy when I had dd at the grand old age of 32!

Mochi1fudge · 04/04/2025 06:48

I remember my first being termed a geriatric pregnancy, when I was 33 in 2006. The community midwife said we use it for all over 30s and I was a bit taken aback as both my mother and sister had pregnancies aged 35 to 40, so I saw it as normal. Second pregnancy age 38 in 2011 I can't recall.

FigPig · 04/04/2025 06:50

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

😂 listen to yourself

Iloveburgerswaymorethanishould · 04/04/2025 06:54

My maternity notes have 3 huge stickers on them. One is a big red one (and I mean big) from 1999 when I was having my first.. said “Teenage pregnancy!” (I was 15 though…) then from my last pregnancy in 2019 it has “Geriatric pregnancy” (I was 36). Then the best one (but the one that stung a little) “Obese patient!” My bmi was 29!!! Which isn’t ideal but ouch!!!. I look back and laugh now but at the time I found them factual, but judgmental!

Conniecoconut · 04/04/2025 06:58

The only time I heard the term geriatric pregnancy was in the 3rd Bridget Jones film 😀

FuckYouTony · 04/04/2025 07:01

Nel45 · 04/04/2025 06:14

Think it definitely must be a regional thing. Ridiculous thing to tell you you’ve got an old womb at 28 😵‍💫 there are so many other common factors much more significant than being your 6th baby. In fact rule out the studies looking an extremely impoverished malnourished women in developing countries having their 5th+ babies (who as you can imagine tend to be even more malnourished by their 5th baby) and you don’t find all that much difference, even for postpartum haemorrhage. Having your first baby is in fact a much bigger risk factor for everything

Ridiculous maybe but doesn't mean it didn't happen. The amount of replies on this thread proves it was still being used in at least the last 8 years.

To be honest, I couldn't get excited about it, it annoyed me more that my husband sniggered "geriatric" at me and made old lady comments for the rest of the day!

ARainyNightInSoho · 04/04/2025 07:01

Thunderpants88 · 04/04/2025 04:06

Been called that far years. It is horrible

It hasn’t been called that for years though. Have you read what the midwife on this thread has said?

FuckYouTony · 04/04/2025 07:06

ARainyNightInSoho · 04/04/2025 07:01

It hasn’t been called that for years though. Have you read what the midwife on this thread has said?

Have you read the full thread?

mondaytosunday · 04/04/2025 07:06

I had mine in my 40s in the early 2000s and not once did they refer to my age except they said I was allowed to have a couple extra tests. I thought ‘geriatric’ was an old fashioned term.

LivingLaVidaBabyShower · 04/04/2025 07:08

My mother was well aware she was having a geriatric pregnancy with her first child (she was 31) and that was in 1982…

oohyoudevilyou · 04/04/2025 07:08

There was barely any mention of age when my Dsis had her first at 46 (tried to conceive for years with her ex but got pregnant within 6 weeks of meeting new partner). Any conversations about age were instigated by her as she was thrilled but terrified! Everything went well, though she had a CS as labour didn't progress.

YouRemindMe0fTheBabe · 04/04/2025 07:11

Not sure it's official, but this term has been used in the UK since at least the 70s. I had my first baby at 34 and my second (selfishly apparently 😂😂) at 37. I was told at my booking appointment for my second that it was classed as a geriatric pregnancy (those exact words were used) because I was over 35. I'm in Scotland and this was in 2017. There was no noticeable difference in the care I received. In the early 70s when my mum had my brother, a geriatric pregnancy was anything over 30. It sounds like it's now over 40. I guess the goal posts shift as more women have babies later in life.

redpaperstar · 04/04/2025 07:11

Nel45 · 04/04/2025 04:18

Yes it’s never a term I have ever seen in any documentation or guidelines, even from a clinical perspective, our guidelines only refer to expectant mothers over 40 as being at any higher risk. Why on earth is the BBC using this term?? It was never even a term had heard by the media until recently

I had my DC 10-12 years ago and was classed as that at ages 33-35.

WhySoManySocks · 04/04/2025 07:13

IntheSpaghetti · 04/04/2025 04:52

Google says ama is women over 35? I can't find a clear guideline for the NHS though. Where can I find this?

It was after 35 until cca 2017, raised to after 40 then.

Pipsquiggle · 04/04/2025 07:15

My DSis is a midwife and referred to me as a geriatric pregnancy when I had DC1 at 35 over 13 years ago

TheIceBear · 04/04/2025 07:15

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

selfish ? My mother had me at 39 I don’t think it’s selfish at all I don’t see her as old I just see her as my mum. Tbh there isn’t that much difference between 35 and 30 so get off your high horse.
It’s very normal for women to have babies in their late 30s and 40s now. Maybe you should watch what you are saying on a forum for pregnant women where plenty of us are over 35.

yomellamoHelly · 04/04/2025 07:17

I was told off by the midwide at my booking in appointment for my first for having a geriatric pregancy. She decided to lecture me on all the likely problems I would experience and my child would have because of my advanced age.
Way to build a relationship .....!

Kindling1970 · 04/04/2025 07:18

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

The thing is people often take longer to settle down now, at 36 I can only afford to start trying now.

Wtafdidido · 04/04/2025 07:18

I was classed as that in 2015 in fact for all my pregnancies and it was only when I objected that the term was removed. I was 31 the first time

MidnightPatrol · 04/04/2025 07:19

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Why is it selfish?

I think every family I know had at least one of the children born when the mother was over 35 - utterly normal.

It would be more surprising to hear that someone under the age of 30 had a baby here in London. I can’t think of anyone who had a baby pre-30!

Bepo77 · 04/04/2025 07:20

I live in London and gave birth in 2021, mine was called geriatric and so were a couple of my friends’ pregnancies. Very strange you’ve never heard of it

Aozora13 · 04/04/2025 07:25

I think it must depend on the trust because I had my eldest at 35 in 2016 and it wasn’t a thing then, no one batted an eyelid. I had my youngest at 40 and being over 40 triggered various things - there weren’t any stickers or anything and I don’t remember the terminology used. Definitely wasn’t geriatric though, although that was used on my mum having a baby in her 30s in the 80s.

allthemiddlechildrenoftheworld · 04/04/2025 07:26

@Nel45 It was written in my notes that I was an elderly prim (older first pregnancy) why I had my first child! I was 25.5 years old!!!!! that was 1980

3amamama · 04/04/2025 07:27

renthead · 04/04/2025 04:36

It’s not a term that is used and hasn’t been for many years. AMA refers to women over 40, not 35.

I’m often a bit sceptical when people say they’ve been labelled with this term. I think that sometimes people think they’ve been labelled that way. I’ve been a midwife since 2011 and it has never been in use within the NHS during that time.

Genuine question - why doubt what women are telling you about their own experiences? It seems rather unfair. Can you see how it might worry people to see this attitude from a HCP particularly at a time when their is more and more recognition of women not being believed or having their concerns dismissed in medicine?

BusyExpert · 04/04/2025 07:29

I trained to be a midwife nearly 50 years ago and it was in regular use then. However I suspect that it has fallen out of use now, as it should with most women having babies much later.