Best Amazon Prime Day deals: Mumsnet favourites

Best Amazon Prime Day deals:
Mumsnet favourites

Shop now

Please or to access all these features

Pregnancy

Talk about every stage of pregnancy, from early symptoms to preparing for birth.

40+1, Sweep #3 Today

4 replies

Lelu2021 · 25/10/2023 08:38

Due with DC#2.

Requested Sweeps #1 39+3, #2 39+7, #3 today 40+1.

Since my first consultation they have recommended induction with the dilapan rods months ago! Why are the NHS so keen on inducing when I am a perfectly healthy individual with no issues during my pregnancy?
I thought there were reduced fetal movements but after constant monitoring and an ultrasound they have confirmed everything is fine. I might just not be paying close enough attention having to chase after my 29m old toddler?

Induction failed at 42+2 with last pregnancy ending in emergency csection, which I am ultimately trying to avoid (avoiding a csection, wanting a vaginal birth, that is.)

Seems like with my track record induction doesn't work but after re-reading all the NICE guidelines there is a 76% chance of vaginal birth at 41 weeks of induction, less than 1% chance of caesarean. Figures which are reassuring... but could also just fail again resulting in another csection which I don't want.
I could just avoid all medical intervention and induction and opt for monitoring.

Just want to hear about other similar stories or advice here please!

OP posts:
Juicyjuicymango · 25/10/2023 09:33

Honestly in your situation I would just pick a date I wasn't comfortable to go past and say if you've not given birth spontaneously by then, then go straight to c section. 3 sweeps by 40+1 seems a lot when up to 42 weeks is a perfectly normal gestation. clearly your body and baby aren't ready yet!

Potatomashed · 25/10/2023 09:48

There’s loads of info here but you might find it easier to scroll to the bit directly relevant to you (VBAC) https://evidencebasedbirth.com/evidence-on-inducing-labor-for-going-past-your-due-date/

Sending you birthy vibes, I’m nearly 41 weeks with my second and not convinced baby is coming any time soon… first was 40 weeks!

Evidence on: Inducing for Due Dates - Evidence Based Birth®

Here we discuss the evidence on inducing for due dates! What are the Pros/Cons of induction when you are approaching or passing your estimated due date?

https://evidencebasedbirth.com/evidence-on-inducing-labor-for-going-past-your-due-date/

Lelu2021 · 25/10/2023 09:50

Honestly this pregnancy is not the least bit inconvenient TBH so I am thankful - normal pains here and there. Anxiety mostly from waiting around AGAIN but I don't mind waiting around, so long as the baby and myself are safe! I want a "natural" birth. The last csection recovery time was awful and I was left traumatised and I also feel induction was not clearly explained to me last time... the fact it could fail!

OP posts:
Tiredbehyondbelief · 25/10/2023 10:08

Hi there, I am a registered midwife working on the labour ward. In my Trust VBAC ladies are routinely induced at 40 weeks. I heard it's because of the evidence there is increased risk of stillbirth after a CS. Half of bereaved parents noticed reduced baby movements before stillbirth. Continous fetal monitoring and a baby well being scan give doctors a snap shot of the baby wellbeing at that moment in time, they don't have predictive power. In my professional practice I always tell parents that how long a woman's labour is going and labour outcome depends on a size and position of the baby and size and shape of a woman's pelvis so combinations are endless (also bearing in mind that babies change position in labour all the time). I understand you want to avoid as much as possible intervention and possibly another CS. However I would listen very carefully to what doctors are saying. Inducing at 40+1 sounds like a sensible option to me. You can maximise your chances by trying to mobilise as much as muchas can. I hope it helps

New posts on this thread. Refresh page