I have been found to be a carrier for group b strep at 20 weeks (I’m now 38 weeks) ..I understand this is common and 1 in 4 women carry the infection at some point. The protocol is to administer antibiotics during labour as a preventative..however I’ve been reading all the medical research studies so i can make an informed choice and I’m leaning towards declining antibiotics unless I meet one of the other risk factors that increases chances of infection (waters break a long time before delivery, prolonged labour, fever during labour etc).
This is my second birth so I’m hoping there won’t actually be enough time for them to give me the drugs which makes the decision easier...but I’ve read that:
- although it lowers the incidence of GBS infection to baby, it doesn’t lower the incidence of serious infection or death. I know GBS can be very very serious but if it doesn’t eliminate this risk, arguably what’s the point?
- it has been found to effect the baby’s gut micobiome for up to a year after birth, leaving them more susceptible to other serious infections and there has been an association with increased serious E. coli antibiotic resistance and even GBS antibiotic resistance after birth in babies who received the antibiotics..so if they do get GBS it’s actually harder to treat than if they’d not had the antibiotics!
- increased risk of thrush to mum and baby which can impact breastfeeding (obviously this is more minor)
I mentioned to my midwife and she was very relaxed about it and said it’s controversial and women do decline because preventative antibiotics are not to be taken lightly..she wasn’t pushing me to get them at all.
I didn’t have any issues with first baby either..quick birth and sent home a few hours later. She said if no antibiotics then they will monitor baby for longer which I’m happy with..just wondering if anyone else had made this decision?