Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

Pregnancy

Talk about every stage of pregnancy, from early symptoms to preparing for birth.

To NIPT or not?!

1 reply

Princesspoppy27 · 05/10/2021 15:41

32 and pregnant with dc2. Combined screening results are great for my age (1:6,000) but conscious this is a huge change from when tested with dc1 2 years ago (1:100,000). I am older which will impact the calculation but it seems it is my beta hCG which has resulted in the higher result this time (2.20). The NT and Papp-a are both ‘fine’.

Would you incur the NIPT cost? We could afford it but not sure if worth the money with a risk factor as good as this? Has anyone done it in similar circumstances and it made them feel better?

OP posts:
Are your children’s vaccines up to date?
Pizzaandsushi · 05/10/2021 17:19

I think a lot depends on what you want the test for. 1:6000 is really good and I personally would not get the NIPT with that score.
I did actually pay the eye-watering amount for the NIPT because the hospital I’m at messed me about so I wasn’t able to get the combined screening and I wanted to know before the weeks of waiting for the quad test. NIPT came back 1:10,000, which I think might be the limit for the one I had as all conditions came back 1:10,000. Then my Quad test came back 1:5400 (I’m 32) and if I’d have had the quad results before NIPT I probably wouldn’t have spent the money but the wait was too much for me.
Plus 1:6000 is less than 0.02% so pretty good! There’s always going to be someone who is that one so I like to think what does 1:10,000 do for me that 1:6000 doesn’t.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page