[quote MissMarion]@hollie29x
I know it looks like the guidance has changed for pregnant women but it's not really the case.
What's really important to understand is that when a new medicine (any new medicine) is approved (at least in EU), it's usually not advised for pregnant women, not because it's unsafe but because there isn't any data in this population (and there's usually a statement to that effect in the patient leaflet). This is for ethical reasons as pregnant women cannot be included in clinical trials, this would be very unethical. So in the absence of data, we prefer to be safe. This is why when the vaccines were rolled out in EU earlier this year, they were not advised for pregnant women.
What happened is that in the US and Israel, unlike in the EU, they did vaccinate pregnant women despite the lack of data (legislation might be different there). So the reason why in April the guidance 'changed' in the UK is that we got real-life (as opposite to clinical) data from over 90,000 US/Israel pregnant women (btw much bigger scale than a clinical trial) showing that the vaccine was safe and effective in this population. Based on the increased risk of COVID for pregnant women compared to non-pregnant women and the newly available data, the guidance was then updated.
Now, due to the new variant and latest wave of infections, the latest data show that pregnant women should actually be a priority group for vaccination (see latest communication on this). The amount of pregnant women ending up in hospital with COVID is very scary.
We now have data on more than 130,000 women and the safety of the vaccine is still not questioned. However, the risks of COVID on the pregnancy and the baby is very well known.
I hope this helps.[/quote]
100% this!
In addition, although the covid vaccine itself is new, the underlying mechanism has been used for 15 years. If there was any effect on children's development it would've been seen by now.