I'm currently pregnant and leaning heavily towards an elective section this time as my first pregnancy ended in an EMCS due to pregnancy complications.
The main thing that has swayed me is the long term damage that is more likely to be incurred as a result of a natural birth. Statistically I have a 75% chance of having a successful natural birth if I opt for it. But that includes all manner of outcomes (including forceps and ventous) and all manner of tears. It's probably 50% chance of a 'normal' natural birth with 'normal' levels of tearing etc. Short term I'm happy with that risk and the recovery/pain. But I really worry about the long term effects from natural labour and that is what is currently swaying me towards an elective section.
For example research I've read suggests overall long term urinary incontinence levels are double for natural births. ~7% for CS Vs ~15% for natural for example. But anecdotally it seems to be agreed/accepted from all mums I've spoken to that after you have a baby you can't go on a trampoline or sneeze or cough without the potential for a little bit of an accident?
So... If people wouldn't mind sharing their thoughts and if they have (or haven't) got any lasting effects from birth I'd appreciate it. For me having had one baby via EMCS my only lasting effect has been that I have the CS scar and a small CS 'shelf' 😅 but neither of those things bother me. I'm trying to work out if statistically it makes sense to roll the dice with a natural birth when (statistically) I'll probably be no worse off long term with an elective section. But the idea of being up and about in a matter of minutes/hours and not going through major surgery is definitely attractive. DH will be home for the first few weeks so we'll be fine either way... Just trying to gather as much information as possible.