Midwives told me it was a no go, consultant told me "your body, your choice".
They did refer me to the psychology service (!!!) to make sure I had a reasonable understanding of the relative risks of caesarean and vaginal delivery, (I
wonder how many men the NHS refers to psychologists before surgery
) and to "offer support" for antenatal anxiety. The psychologists were awesome, and very clear that their role was to help me make the right decision for me.
At the time I could cite a lot of stats on the risks - e.g. that CS babies are more likely to require breathing support (but that study compared CS babies born before 37 weeks with full term vaginal deliveries and the numbers were something like 3% and 2% respectively, I've forgotten exactly). I also think a lot of the data are skewed towards CS appearing riskier because they almost always include emergency sections, when the baby is already in distress/ something has gone wrong, or sections planned because the pregnancy has risk factors already, and the vaginal deliveries, by definition, are those that went well enough to avoid EMCS. I tried very hard, and never succeeded in finding a large-scale study that assessed outcomes for low- risk planned sections.
Among other things, I wished to avoid an assisted birth and birth injury. It turned out that dc was back-to-back and had the cord twice round neck, so I very much feel I dodged a bullet. Of the 6 in my NCT group, only 1 had an easier recovery than me, and they all attempted vaginal delivery.
Well done on sticking up for yourself. I think a lot of midwives especially minimise the risks of vaginal delivery and overstate the availability of postnatal support for birth injury. But then the psychologists diagnosed me with tokophobia, so I guess I would say that.