Are your children’s vaccines up to date?

Set a reminder

Please or to access all these features

Pregnancy

Talk about every stage of pregnancy, from early symptoms to preparing for birth.

Is the nub theory of gender prediction accurate , or just guesswork ?

8 replies

sarahhoping · 25/12/2019 11:07

checking for the slant of genital nub against the spine at 12 week of pregnancy. How accurate is it ?
does it have any science behind it , or just another fun game of pregnancy ?

OP posts:
Are your children’s vaccines up to date?
Perid0t · 26/12/2019 12:33

You will find sonographers use it so it’s a strong indication but not fool proof. There is always an exception to the rule and low nubs can rise. I used it for both my girls l. I’d say accuracy is around 80% in my experience.

Bluebutterfly90 · 26/12/2019 12:36

I mentioned it to the woman who did my scan and she rolled her eyes and said it's nonsense.
My SIL likes it though and from my first scan predicted a little girl.
It's a boy.
I don't know if there's any science behind it, but I wouldn't take it too seriously.

doublebarrellednurse · 26/12/2019 12:42

There's no evidence for it but was accurate for both of mine!

worried111111 · 27/12/2019 10:47

My sonographer said to take it with a pinch of salt but that it is the only theory of that type that holds any weight at all. She said our nub is pointing towards a girl and was right.

Shelbustotherescue · 27/12/2019 17:41

Was right for me !

sarahhoping · 16/02/2020 13:20

OP here. It was true for me as well. I have a boy now finally after 38 weeks . :)

OP posts:
Remmy123 · 16/02/2020 14:58

Very very accurate if the nub is clear and the person knows how to read them

OhhBoyy · 18/02/2020 11:06

There is some evidence for it, I found at least 2 research papers that said the sex of a foetus could be predicted from the “genital tubercle angle”. 1999 paper said accuracy was 70.3% at 11 weeks, 98.7% at 12 weeks, and 100% at 13 weeks. A 2011 study also found that it was an accurate way to determine sex and referenced 5 similar studies with varying rates of accuracy (74 -100%).

Basically, there is plenty of evidence to say that it’s highly accurate when done by professionals who know what they’re looking for, but bear in mind that these ultrasounds are being performed to get a clear image of the “nub” and are then being examined by highly trained medical professionals rather than the average sonogropher (no shade to sonogrophers, I just mean that these will be some of the top people in their field)

Accuracy rates will be a lot lower for the average scan as they aren’t looking for a clear shot of the “nub”. Add on that people are guessing based on how the nub appears visually (compared to the studies which are calculating the exact angle) then it’s basically down to a 50/50 guess!

Sorry, I have really rambled on but I found it fascinating and it kind of annoys me when people say there is “no evidence” of something when there clearly is. The evidence just isn’t reflective of the average “nub theory” guess. If you’re interested in the actual research just google “genital tubercle ultrasound” instead of “nub theory”.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page